AI Rate Professor

Art

Michele Laughlin

ART2448945 · ART647464 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Skip if you want engaged studio mentoring; if and ignore uneven teaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSlow GradingAttitude IssuesFavorites ConcernProject BasedEasy If Finished
  • , and several students still leave with As.
  • Common complaints , and weak critique quality.
  • Attendance and presence matter more than deep theoretical difficulty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Multiple students report high grades when projects are completed, even with weak instruction.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

and glue-type work, though .

All evidence is in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

40/100

and punish lateness; if work is finished.

All evidence is in-person and somewhat conflicting.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and repeated personality, favoritism, and disengagement complaints outweigh a few positive notes.

All evidence is in-person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Completing stated project requirements often yields high marks despite critique complaints.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Regular studio projects and occasional heavy art-appreciation assignments, not constant exams.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Students cite absence from the room, judgmental critiques, attitude, and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

, and occasional field-trip alternatives rather than exams.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

frustration over presence, grading speed, favorites, and classroom climate.

Main concern

, and perceived favoritism hurt the experience.

What students said

“This professor has no passion for the subject”
ART2448945
“She is an , as long as you complete her requirements, she will give you an A.”
ART2448945
“She played favorites.”
ART2448945

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is studio projects and critiques, not traditional closed-book testing.

Project BasedCritiquesWork In Progress AllowedNo Formal Exams Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and critique based; unfinished work can sometimes still receive credit.

Studio ProjectsCritiquesWork In Progress
“If you didn't finish the it as a "work in progress" and would still give you a grade for it.”
ART2448945
“Critiques are easy.”
ART2448945

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor has no passion for the subject, she'd rather be in the ceramics room next door than her actual classroom helping her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews, highlighting engagement gaps and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Presence

34/100

“She loves to hang out at the art club next door rather than in her own classroom.”

🅰️ Easy Completer Grades

76/100

“She is an , as long as you complete her requirements, she will give you an A.”

⚖️ Fairness Concerns

30/100

“She played favorites.”

⏳

35/100

“She takes FOREVER to grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • no passion for the subject
  • gives an attitude sometimes

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • takes FOREVER to grade

Theme 3

⚠️ Classroom Climate

  • She played favorites
  • hard to talk to
  • annoying af

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only eight reviews, but recent and thematically consistent on climate and .

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ART24489457 reviews
ART6474641 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values