AI Rate Professor

Film

rosemary cabrera

FTV45A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you have no alternative and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderUnclear criteriaNo late workGrades on looksHeavy assignments
  • Students report
  • No late work allowed despite claims of wanting everyone to pass
  • and a low reported grade

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

, and a reported D+ make an A unrealistic.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty is moderate, but and .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as mandatory and participation matters.

Evidence comes only from the in-person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Quality is rated 1 with and .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

and alleged appearance-based scoring.

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Few group projects but and no late submissions allowed.

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Student reports unfair standards and a disconnect between stated and .

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Many assignments and .

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person FTV-45A is described as unfair, strict on deadlines, and poorly graded.

Main concern

and zero late-work flexibility.

What students said

“She would grade you based on looks and not based on how much work you did or the editing.”
FTV-45A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but grading and deadline enforcement are described as strict.

Strict deadlinesNo late work

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person review stresses no late work and .

Strict deadlinesNo late workUnclear grading criteria
“she wont let you turn in any late work no matter what.”
FTV-45A
“Not a .”
FTV-45A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She would grade you based on looks and not based on how much work you did or the editing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 and strict policies. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“She would grade you based on looks and not based on how much work you did or the editing.”

⚖️

14/100

“Not a .”

📅 Deadline Strictness

20/100

“she wont let you turn in any late work no matter what.”

👎 Recommendation

12/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Not a
  • Participation matters

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • grade you based on looks
  • Many assignments

Theme 3

⚠️ About Policies

  • wont let you turn in any late work no matter what
  • doesnt want to fail anyone but she wont let you turn in any late work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

, so the but sample size is very small.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

FTV-45A1 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values