AI Rate Professor

English

Michele Pfenninger

ENG4569 · ENGLISH1A · ENG41238 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you have no other option; students warn of and little teaching value.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderConfused gradingPop quizzesLecture heavyDo not take
  • Universal 1/5 quality and 0% take-again among those who answered
  • Students report harsh or
  • , and little perceived learning or support

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Students report Ds, harsh zeros, and 66% papers others thought deserved As; an A looks extremely hard to earn.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Difficulty is rated max , and heavy lectures rather than clear learning.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory with tags warning that skipping means you will not pass.

All evidence is in person; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Every review is a hard avoid with quality 1 and .

All evidence is in person with unanimous negative tone.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Tough and seemingly inconsistent paper grading is the dominant complaint, including zeros after office-hour edits.

Format shift

In-person only; no online comparison.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of , and lecture-heavy load.

Format shift

In-person only; no online comparison.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students say she reads from the book, does not teach well, and does not care if students fail.

Format shift

In-person only; no online comparison.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Heavy papers plus tests and pop quizzes dominate; lecture and reading feed those assessments.

Format shift

In-person only; no online comparison.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

fairness, teaching, and student care.

Main concern

Harsh or inconsistent paper grades, pop quizzes, and .

What students said

“ !! She will fail you no matter what.”
ENG4569
“ book , after she has assigned for you to do so the night before.”
ENGLISH1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Pop quizzes and little student-friendly flexibility.

Pop quizzesTest heavyPaper heavyTough grading

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and severely graded papers with no student-friendly exam format mentioned.

Pop quizzesTest heavySo many papersTough grader
“ and still gave me a zero.”
ENG4569
“my mom is an English professor at and said it deserved a 95% and this teacher grades me 66%.”
ENG41238

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !! She will fail you no matter what.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews with zero and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

5/100

“ .”

⚖️

8/100

“I wouldnt say a " grader.”

📉 Teaching Quality

10/100

“You will not learn anything , and she will allow for you to fail, she does not care for students.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She will fail you no matter what.
  • She's EXTREMELY suspicious with grades.
  • She grades hard and doesnt teach good all in one.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she reads out of the book
  • You will not learn anything
  • unless you have a doctorate.

Theme 3

📝

  • Lots of homework
  • Beware of pop quizzes
  • So many papers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 reviews but and avoid advice across 2016-2024 strengthens the signal despite small n.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG45692 reviews
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
ENG412381 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values