AI Rate Professor

Art History

Jeff Ribaudo

ART22 · ART6 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want an easy art grade and can teach yourself; avoid the online ART22 section if you want real instruction.

Best fit · Easy A HunterBusywork not teachingEasy A if self-taughtOnline communication black holeSnappy but sometimes kindStudy guide equals the test
  • In-person sections feel easy and passable with ; online ART22 is widely described as no teaching and pure busywork.
  • Most reported grades are A or A+, so grades come easy even when students say they learned nothing.
  • older in-person ART6 students recommend him; recent online ART22 students warn others away.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students routinely report A or A+ with , and .

Both online and ; online still feels empty of teaching.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Content is treated as high-school-level art busywork with low conceptual challenge.

Online and as easy; online adds confusion from vague prompts.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory for both formats.

Evidence of and in-person comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

; online students say if you want to learn.

In-person reviews lean positive; online ART22 reviews lean strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Many A and A+ grades with and easy pass paths.

Format shift

Lenient outcomes show up in both formats despite weak online instruction.

Workload

Light

68/100

Workload is mostly weekly busywork and .

Format shift

Online feels like constant busywork; as some of the easiest.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and passionate; online students say he does not teach at all.

Format shift

In-person teaching is mixed-to-good; online is widely called absent and confusing.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of and final; online is assignment-heavy.

Format shift

and final; online focuses on weekly turn-ins.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person ART6 and ART22 feel easy, informal, and passable with , and a .

Main concern

He can be crabby or snappy, and the class is more deadline-chasing than deep art learning.

What students said

“This class was so easy you have no idea!”
ART6
“As for the is exactly the same as the test”
ART6
“His class was easy, it was just a lot of busy work.”
ART22

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ART22 is repeatedly described as vague text prompts, , and weekly busywork with almost no learning.

Main concern

Zero real teaching and unclear assignment directions leave students googling everything alone.

What students said

“Doesn't give any lectures or lessons, just vague instructions for the assignment.”
ART22
“Awful, no teaching was done and ”
ART22
“Easy assignments, but almost no communication”
ART22

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Where exams appear, they are easy and often match the study guide; .

Study guide matches testMidterm and finalAssignment-heavy online

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final with a study guide that matches the test.

Midterm and finalStudy guide equals exam
“he gives out a study that is exactly the same as the ”
ART6
“We only had a midterm and a final.”
ART22

Online

Online reviews emphasize weekly assignments and vague directions more than formal exams.

Weekly assignmentsBusywork focus
“The .”
ART22

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're thinking about taking the class to learn design, you should reconsider.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews (4 online, 5 in person), highlighting teaching . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality Split

48/100

“Doesn't give any lectures or lessons, just vague instructions for the assignment.”

🅰️ Easy Grades

82/100

“This class was so easy you have no idea!”

📦 Busywork Reality

68/100

“His class was easy, it was just a lot of busy work.”

👍 Recommendation Split

42/100

“Great teacher, gets you interested in art. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't give any lectures or lessons, just vague instructions for the assignment.
  • Fascinating and passionate. Really great teacher
  • he really knows his stuff.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class was so easy you have no idea!
  • I can honestly say that I learned nothing.
  • study that & you'll be fine

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • almost no communication
  • if you have a .
  • Lazy, if youre

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across online and , but some older sparse comments and mixed take-again data lower confidence.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART225 reviews
ART64 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values