AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Peter Buchman

MATH64 · MATH35 · MAT52 · MATH53 · MAT53 · HJJKGGHGF · MATH52 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in algebra and need almost no instruction from lecture.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSoft-spoken and hard to hearWeak lecturesSelf-teach requiredExtra credit possibleClass abandonment story
  • Most students .
  • He works better only if you already know the math and teach yourself.
  • One dramatic recent review claims he disappeared for weeks and never returned.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

He can be soft on grades with , score replacement, or , but learning still falls on you.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students who need because lectures do not explain clearly.

All evidence is in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Even self-teachers say you must still attend to track the changing schedule.

All evidence is in-person.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most detailed reviews urge picking someone else or report dropping quickly after .

All evidence is in-person; because few answered.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

some mention and replacing a low test with the .

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Light

65/100

Class time is short and as overwhelming; the .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Dominant feedback is boring, soft-spoken, poorly planned lectures that force self-teaching.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Students stress self-written tests that .

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math reviews describe soft-spoken, short, that and grade help if you ask.

Main concern

Poor lecture clarity plus a report of prolonged no-show abandonment.

What students said

“For 2wks he didn't show up for work. The college sent people to knock on his door and no one answers.”
MATH35
“He never spent much time teaching, but expects you to know how to do the work.”
MATH35
“you shouldn't have to independently ask for what should be covered clearly in lecture.”
MAT53

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are teacher-written and if you stay.

Professor-designed testsHomework may not match testsExtra creditReplace lowest test with final

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students say homework does not fully prepare you for his custom tests, though and .

Custom testsHomework mismatchExtra creditFinal replaces lowest test
“very boring lecturer, he also designs his own tests so doing the test.”
MATH53
“He gives opportunities and lets you replace your lowest test score with .”
MATH53

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He never spent much time teaching, but expects you to know how to do the work. He is not ideal for people who need more help with the learning part.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person math reviews with medium consistency on weak lectures. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“He found a way to make adding positives and negatives confussing and just dragged on.”

👎 Lecture Clarity

20/100

“He may be a sweet dude, but he's not a great professor.”

🧭 Who Survives

60/100

“He's the professor for the .”

⚠️ Reliability Concern

15/100

“Finally, 3wks in he returns an hour late as his replacement shakes his head at him and he just walks straight out and was never seen again.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very boring lecturer
  • He did not make any sense
  • barely audible lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • since everyone dropped, except 4 people that stayed until the last day, he gave as passing grades.
  • He gives opportunities
  • doing the test.

Theme 3

🧭

  • Students who don't need any type of instruction and are already proficient in .
  • Try Sidhum.
  • I also dropped after second class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only 9 mostly short in-person reviews over many years, directionally consistent on weak teaching but limited sample detail.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH352 reviews
MATH532 reviews
HJJKGGHGF1 review
MAT521 review
MAT531 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH521 review
MATH641 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values