AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Leah Ramalingam

CAT30 · BUS101 · CAT · CAT48917 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a kind, easy-A business or CAT class and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterLots of HomeworkCaringGet Ready to ReadExtra CreditMixed Technical Skill
  • Grades are generally easy with many As and opportunities.
  • Workload is heavy with lots of .
  • caring and story-driven, but some report rambling and weak tech knowledge.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Reported A, A-, and A+ grades plus make high marks attainable with effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Students call material not hard or dull but learnable, with technical depth varying by course.

In-person only; difficulty ratings mostly low with one outlier.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory with only one optional note.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and easy grades despite mixed teaching.

and not universal in older reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Easy grading, , and many A-range grades show lenient evaluation.

Format shift

In-person grade reports dominate.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Repeated lots of and comments that one-unit classes still dump heavy work.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and uneven technical skill.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

and early due-date dumps drive assessment more than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews split between warm, easy classes with and older complaints of rambling or weak technical instruction.

Main concern

Heavy workload for limited units and uneven technical teaching quality.

What students said

“she gives lots of opportunities for .”
CAT
“its easy just a lot a lot of work.”
CAT48917
“Rambles blindly, no technical knowledge of needed programs”
CAT30

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize homework and .

Assignment HeavyExtra CreditLimited Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Little explicit exam-policy detail; success is and .

Assignment HeavyExtra Credit
“she gives lots of opportunities for .”
CAT

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“i love taking her class i feel like im at home with grandmother.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting kindness, workload, and mixed skill. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Caring Instructor

80/100

“ and kind and works with disabled students.”

📚 Heavy Workload

28/100

“its easy just a lot a lot of work.”

🎯 Teaching Consistency

55/100

“Rambles blindly, no technical knowledge of needed programs”

🅰️ Easy Grades

82/100

“she gives lots of opportunities for .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has plenty of stories and will repeat them when it ties into the lecture.
  • She's very sweet once you get to know her
  • all she really does is read us the work she sends us

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The classes she teaches are not hard
  • its easy just a lot a lot of work.
  • she gives lots of opportunities for .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • i feel like im at home with grandmother.
  • and kind and works with disabled students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five in-person reviews spanning 2015-2022 show consistent easy-grade and heavy-work themes with mixed teaching quality.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CAT302 reviews
BUS1011 review
CAT1 review
CAT489171 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values