AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

J Namekata

MATH35 · MAT35 · MAT52 · MAT1A · MATH11 · MATH52 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Strong choice if and , but recent support concerns deserve caution.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear ExplanationsTest-Heavy GradingExtra Credit OptionsHistorically StrongUneven Recent Reviews
  • Older , and award-winning as a math professor.
  • Grades often hinge on tests, sometimes 100 percent of the grade, with optional .
  • Newer comments allege unhelpful attitude and inflexibility, including a serious military accommodation complaint.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

and dropped lowest test can raise scores, but .

; the one online review does not prove grade outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Some call the class easy and clear, while others call him extremely fast and among the hardest teachers.

Difficulty comments .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

as mandatory in some sections and not mandatory in others.

; one in-person review says yes.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

Long record of and a few serious recent complaints.

; the lone online review is negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

64/100

and dropping the lowest test soften a test-heavy scheme.

Format shift

Leniency details appear in older in-person reviews only.

Workload

Light

62/100

if you already understand the material.

Format shift

Workload comments are from in-person courses; online evidence is thin.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

, though recent reports of cold or unhelpful behavior lower confidence.

Format shift

In-person quality is mostly excellent; online quality in the sample is poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Multiple reviews say tests are all or nearly all of the grade.

Format shift

; online policy is not detailed.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and student-focused teaching, with a minority citing speed, rigid tests, or inflexibility.

Main concern

Fast pacing and ; one military-order accommodation conflict.

What students said

“ .”
MATH11
“Test scores are 100% of the grade but . Really easy class.”
MAT1A
“In his syllabus, he claims to support military/military orders; but he does not!!!”
MATH11

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative early in the term, calling him unhelpful and confirming prior bad comments.

Main concern

Perceived lack of help and poor online start experience.

What students said

“he is not a good professor. All the bad comments are true. . He does not seem interested in helping.”
MATH11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is test-centered with some relief via dropped scores and .

Tests 100% of GradeDrop Lowest TestExtra Credit Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

grade, with optional and dropping the lowest test.

Tests 100% of GradeDrop Lowest TestExtra Credit Quizzes
“Makes the tests 100% of grade. Probably the hardest teacher I've ever taken.”
MATH35
“ but you gets extra points that you can add to your test scores.”
MAT1A

Online

Online reviews .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews (1 online, 9 in person), balancing long-term praise with recent concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

72/100

“ .”

📝 Test Weight

88/100

“Makes the tests 100% of grade.”

🎁 Grade Cushion

64/100

“ but you gets extra points that you can add to your test scores.”

⚠️ Recent Concern

35/100

“He does not seem interested in helping.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great teacher and was well prepared for class
  • He makes it easy to learn the material
  • the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Test scores are 100% of the grade but
  • Goes extremely fast
  • Really easy class

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support Issues

  • he refused to work with me
  • All the bad comments are true

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews span many years with strong historical consistency, but sparse recent detail and .

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH113 reviews
MATH352 reviews
MATH522 reviews
MAT1A1 review
MAT351 review
Show 1 more courses
MAT521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1