AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Julius Anjangha

CHE20746 · CHE2A · CHEM2A · CHE1A · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you can handle tough chem pacing, study hard, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough chemistryLecture heavyThick accentTest heavyPolarizing support
  • Chemistry content is hard, accelerated, and .
  • In-person students often praise kindness and ; one online review and one recent in-person review report rudeness or poor help.
  • Drops and exist, but tough grading and As hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and C or drop outcomes show high effort is required and an A is not easy.

Online review is negative on support; in-person notes drops and but .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

, and high difficulty ratings make content demanding.

Both formats rate difficulty around 4; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and tags warn skip class and you will not pass.

In-person often mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

and lectures, but rude moments and weak online support make him a risk.

In-person recommendations are mixed-positive; the sole .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

and test-heavy tags dominate, partially offset by dropped lowest scores and easy .

Format shift

; in-person also tough but with drops and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and frequent tests right after chapters.

Format shift

; online still hard with little instructional support.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Some call him a great lecturer who waits until everyone understands; others cite snapping, vague help, or YouTube learning more.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is stronger; online support quality is clearly weaker.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Exams, labs, and and graded-by-few-things themes.

Format shift

; online mentions inflexible exam timing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person accelerated chem is demanding but several students credit him for clarity, care, drops, and despite a thick accent and .

Main concern

Rudeness under pressure and .

What students said

“SO rude. He looses patience so fast and snaps at students.”
CHE1A
“This was the first time I took chemistry & actually understood it”
CHEM2A
“He , and 3 lowest homework assignments, on top of giving us easy .”
CHE1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online CHE1A suffered from sparse Zoom lectures, hard-to-reach help, vague answers, and .

Main concern

Limited contact and .

What students said

“We barely had zoom lectures and it was hard to contact him for help.”
CHE1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and online rescheduling is refused even for work conflicts.

Test heavyDropped lowest examSame-day chapter testsInflexible exam timing online

Assessment risk

Strict

36/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, though lowest exam can be dropped.

Test heavyDropped lowest examAccelerated pacing
“The so you have to work hard and practice in order to do well.”
CHE2A
“He , and 3 lowest homework assignments, on top of giving us easy .”
CHE1A

Online

Online exams appear inflexible; students report no alternate timing even when work conflicts exist.

No exam reschedulingTough grader
“if you have work during exams he though many students have no choice but to work.”
CHE1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This was the first time I took chemistry & actually understood it & I am not dreading 2B.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (1 online, 5 in person), highlighting hard chem pacing, mixed support, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Professor Julius Anjangha is a great lecturer and he always stops and asks for questions and as well.”

🔥 Course Difficulty

24/100

“The so you have to work hard and practice in order to do well.”

⚠️ Support Risk

30/100

“We barely had zoom lectures and it was hard to contact him for help.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and caring and truly wanted
  • great lecturer and he always stops and asks for questions
  • I learned more from youtube than I did his lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class is tough but its hard to judge based on winter accelerated course.
  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

⚡ About Tone & Access

  • SO rude. He looses patience so fast and snaps at students.
  • Even if he did help he'd give vague answers that just raised more confusion.
  • if you .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent reviews from 2021-2022 are detailed and mixed, giving a usable picture though online evidence is only one review.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHE1A3 reviews
CHE207461 review
CHE2A1 review
CHEM2A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1