AI Rate Professor

Economics

Susan Nowaktar

ECON47943 · ECO8 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid Susan Nowaktar; both reviews warn of , and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoes not know how to teachCondescendingTough graderTalks about personal issues
  • Students say material is not covered thoroughly and self-teaching or tutoring is required
  • Tone described as condescending with inappropriate comments about students ability
  • creates high risk

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

an A depend on heavy self-study.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Difficulty up to 5/5 with incomplete lectures that force students to learn alone.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Both reviews mark attendance mandatory with skip-class-you-wont-pass style tags.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Both students and one rated the experience a zero.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and graded by few things while judging as if students learned incomplete material.

Format shift

Based on two in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is less about volume of homework and .

Format shift

Based on two in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students say she cannot teach, digresses into personal issues, and talks down to the class.

Format shift

Based on two in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Graded by few things with test performance framed as the main judgment of learning.

Format shift

Based on two in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and graded harshly on limited items.

Main concern

You must teach yourself while and .

What students said

“She does not know how to teach!!! You will have to teach yourself or get a really great tutor!”
ECO8
“Did not cover material thoroughly, always saying, Oh you know this.”
ECON47943

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments feel sparse and strict; reviews but .

Graded by few thingsTough graderTest-focused

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

standards and incomplete lecture prep.

Graded by few thingsTough grader
“although she is easy going don't get comfortable she will grade you as if you learned anything.”
ECON47943
“If you read your chapters and studied for the not dumb!”
ECO8

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She does not know how to teach!!! You will have to teach yourself or get a really great tutor!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting teaching quality and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Failure

12/100

“She does not know how to teach!!! You will have to teach yourself or get a really great tutor!”

😠 Condescending Tone

10/100

“The fault is of your parents because it is your genes, they are dumb!”

⚖️

18/100

“she will grade you as if you learned anything. Did not cover material thoroughly”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does not know how to teach!!!
  • She continuously talks about personal issues
  • Did not cover material thoroughly, always saying, Oh you know this.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she will grade you as if you learned anything
  • You will have to teach yourself or get a really great tutor!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Two consistent negative reviews from 2018-2019 with vivid detail, but still a small sample.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECO81 review
ECON479431 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1