AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Sandy Baker

N22 · NURS310 · NURSING · NURSING2OB · NURSING2 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Avoid if you have any alternative; reviews describe poor support and a demoralizing classroom climate.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedCondescendingUnfriendlyStrict GradingAvoid
  • , and unhelpful.
  • answered.
  • One older review calls her funny, but overall tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

and difficulty; the only listed grade is a C- and easy-A talk is absent.

; in-person focuses more on tone than grade formulas.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty ratings are mixed but comments emphasize stress and harsh treatment more than advanced content.

Limited academic-content detail in both formats.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Only ; most leave attendance unstated.

In-person N22 notes mandatory attendance; other formats do not specify.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

and repeated do-not-take warnings.

Online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Online student says grading ; overall grade picture is weak.

Format shift

review.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload details are sparse; complaints center on support and tone more than assignment volume.

Format shift

Neither format gives a rich workload inventory.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Dominant themes are disorganization, condescension, and lack of help, with only one brief positive note.

Format shift

Online and in-person both emphasize disorganization and unfriendly tone.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention assignments and program standards but .

Format shift

; in-person is light on assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person nursing reviews mostly slam her as unfriendly, ego-driven, and hard on students.

Main concern

Condescending tone and focus on program stats over student support.

What students said

“Not very encouraging, and very focused on pass rates and school statistics rather than individual student success.”
N22
“ .”
NURSING
“Funny professor”
NURSING2

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online student reports disorganized instructions, condescending replies, and .

Main concern

Strict grading paired with missing or .

What students said

“Dr. and condescending with ”
NURS310

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring details.

Online

Online comments address assignment instructions and .

Strict Assignment Grading
“ never received the instruction for the assignment in the first place.”
NURS310

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews spanning online and and support-failure themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

8/100

“ .”

📂

15/100

“Dr. and condescending with ”

😕 Unsupportive Climate

18/100

“Not very encouraging, and very focused on pass rates and school statistics rather than individual student success.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Disorganized and unfriendly.
  • condescending with
  • Funny professor

Theme 2

⚠️ About Professionalism

  • This professor is dishonest and vengeful.
  • She is crude and unprofessional.
  • Perpetuates the culture of egotism

Theme 3

📉 About Student Support

  • She is NO help to anyone
  • Difficult to get a hold of as a student.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews span 2004-2019 and are consistently negative, but many are old and short with little grade detail.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

NURSING22 reviews
N221 review
NURS3101 review
NURSING1 review
NURSING2OB1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values