AI Rate Professor

English

Edgar Hernandez

ENG1A47077 · ENG44008 · ENG1 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take him if you want a caring English professor who rewards effort and participation; and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and understandingInteractive lecturesSlow email repliesLecture heavyAllows late work
  • Most students call him caring, passionate, and engaging in class.
  • Workload centers on papers and a .
  • One early review found him uninspiring and unresponsive, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic if and show effort; but not a free A.

Online student reported an easy A with late-work flexibility; structured papers.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is standard college English with papers and presentations rather than extreme theory or light busywork.

Online difficulty rated low; one negative review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory; only the online review said it was not.

Evidence of .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Four of and call him caring and strong in class.

Online recommendation is strongly positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Allows late work with valid reasons and is understanding when students communicate.

Format shift

Leniency is clearest online; in person he still expects effort and participation.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Typical load is several papers plus a .

Format shift

Online called fairly easy; in person describes four papers and a presentation.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students praise interactive lectures and care; one review called him uninspiring and paycheck-driven.

Format shift

Online stressed kindness; in , and passion with one sharp outlier.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

, and participation more than traditional high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize written work; exams are not clearly described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person he is usually seen as passionate, interactive, and encouraging, with papers and a presentation as core work.

Main concern

and one student found him uninspiring and hard to reach.

What students said

“Honestly, one of the . 4 papers, and .”
ENG1A47077
“Its interactive and his lectures are interesting.”
ENG44008
“The most uninspiring English professor ever.”
ENG1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online ENG1 felt fairly easy with and flexibility on late work for valid reasons.

Main concern

, so plan ahead for communication.

What students said

“his class is fairly easy and ”
ENG1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews highlight papers and a , so exam risk looks moderate and underspecified.

Final presentationPaper-based assessmentLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a ; closed-book exam rules are not clearly proven.

Final presentationMultiple papers
“4 papers, and .”
ENG1A47077

Online

No clear exam policy is described for online ENG1 beyond an overall easy course experience.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly, one of the . 4 papers, and . Super caring and passionate!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting teaching care, workload, and communication gaps. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Its interactive and his lectures are interesting.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

80/100

“ .”

❤️ Care for Students

78/100

“ , if only you level with him.”

⚠️ Communication Gap

35/100

“this professor doesn't take the time to answer emails on time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Honestly, one of the .
  • Its interactive and his lectures are interesting.
  • He's a fun guy. Enjoyed his class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • his class is fairly easy and
  • 4 papers, and
  • allowing late submissions even for major assignments

Theme 3

💌 About Communication

  • he rarely responded to emails
  • this professor doesn't take the time to answer emails on time

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews spanning 2019-2025 give useful detail, but one online review and .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG12 reviews
ENG440082 reviews
ENG1A470771 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1