AI Rate Professor

Film

Nino Giornalista

DIGEDITIN · TEL64 · FTV45 · FTV64 · FILM · FTV66 · EDITING · VIDEOEDITING · TEL65 · TEL320 · DIGITALEDITING · TELE64 · FILMEDIT · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Consider him if you want patient Final Cut-style editing instruction and can stay awake through slow, note-heavy lectures.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyFinal Cut Pro focusedSlow lecture paceHelpful when engagedPolarizing teaching styleMandatory attendance signals
  • Many older reviews praise him as a nice, knowledgeable Final Cut/editing instructor.
  • Critics , and limited hands-on time.
  • , and experiences are highly polarized.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

, while others report easy success, so an A usually needs notes, deadlines, and steady work.

All evidence is in-person; grades reported include A and B.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Average difficulty is moderate-low and many describe editing concepts as learnable with .

All difficulty evidence is in-person film/editing courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and skipping class means you will not pass.

Attendance detail is sparse but the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Strong fans and strong detractors both appear often, so fit depends on tolerance for slow lecture-first teaching.

All recommendation tone comes from in-person reviews; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Comments range from fair/patient to tough or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

notes, deadlines, and .

Format shift

All workload comments are in-person.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

About half the class loves his method and helpfulness; others find lectures too slow, unhelpful, or poorly applied to software.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in-person and spans many years.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Students mention notes, assignments, deadlines, and practical editing work without a .

Format shift

Assessment detail is limited and all in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person film/editing classes range from highly recommended patient teaching to frustration over pace, favorites, and industry-tool relevance.

Main concern

Slow lectures and limited hands-on computer time frustrate some students.

What students said

“His method of lecturing while knowlege to the program- worked great.”
TEL64
“horrible horrible horrible. Plays favorites like crazy, lectures super slow.”
TEL65
“Professor Giornalista isn't tolerant to questions of when you will learn certain skills”
FTV64

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews rarely describe formal exams and focus more on notes, projects, and editing practice.

Limited exam detailProject and assignment oriented

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize lectures, notes, and editing .

Notes matterEditing projectsLimited exam detail
“Too many notes and too little actual, physical computer editing.”
EDITING
“A little slow in lectures, but !”
FTV64

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ AND GOOD TEACHER.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 in-person film/editing reviews, highlighting polarized views on pace and hands-on practice. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Method

58/100

“His method of lecturing while knowlege to the program- worked great.”

👎 Polarized Frustration

30/100

“horrible horrible horrible. Plays favorites like crazy, lectures super slow.”

🧰 Hands-On Gap

45/100

“he has to understand that teaching anything on the computer you have to let the students touch it, not only make notes!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a very nice teacher.
  • as your professor when learning the concepts of F.C.P.
  • lectures super slow.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but I personally earned that A!
  • .
  • I ACED the class but thats only cause of 6 years of prior knowledge

Theme 3

🎬 About Course Content

  • you can learn about editing with this teacher
  • Too many notes and too little actual, physical computer editing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews provide volume, but many are old, short, and polarized with .

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

FTV643 reviews
EDITING2 reviews
FILM2 reviews
DIGEDITIN1 review
DIGITALEDITING1 review
Show 8 more courses
FILMEDIT1 review
FTV451 review
FTV661 review
TEL3201 review
TEL641 review
TEL651 review
TELE641 review
VIDEOEDITING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values