AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Karin Skiba

ART · ART6 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Only take her if and papers and ignore blunt feedback; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy ReadingLots Of PapersExtra CreditConfusing Course SitesRude Feedback
  • Content is not intellectually brutal but workload and .
  • Many students call her rude or condescending while .
  • , and assignment-heavy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Students who buy the , and use can earn strong grades, but time cost is high.

Online reviews stress daily work; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Many say the material is not hard; difficulty comes from volume of reading and .

Both formats agree the .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Several reviews mark attendance mandatory, especially online or short-term sections with heavy due-date pressure.

Online ; older in-person-tagged posts rarely discuss it.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and repeated reports of rudeness and confusion outweigh the fans who like .

Recent online reviews are more negative on tone; older posts are more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

can be substantial, but Tough Grader tags and .

Format shift

appears in both formats; toughness complaints are stronger online.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

textbook reading, and multi-hour exams.

Format shift

Online summer reviews describe the heaviest day-to-day load.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

and site ; some students still call her kind or thorough.

Format shift

Online students more often report rude remarks and broken links.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Frequent assignments and papers sit alongside long midterms and finals drawn from the book.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Older reviews still mostly describe online-style ART6 work: , and uneven tone.

Main concern

, and mean comments despite .

What students said

“Hard to understand what she is looking for to give a decent grade.”
ART6
“GIVES ALOT OF , THOUGH- GOOD STUFF, LIKE 15% WORTH.”
ART6
“ . I am glad I took this class!”
ART6

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ART6 is reading-heavy with , and mixed reports of kindness versus rudeness.

Main concern

Confusing outdated sites, harsh communication, and .

What students said

“Very very rude. She does not seem to know how to communicate without being rude or condescending.”
ART6
“The class is not hard its just very time consuming. .”
ART6
“ ! A lot if not ALL of the answer to the midterm and .”
ART6

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are long and book-driven; reviews do not clearly prove webcam or Lockdown Browser proctoring.

Book-Based Midterm And FinalLong Timed ExamsEssay ExamsExtra Credit Available

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Older posts mention essay exams and thorough fine-art testing; .

Essay ExamsThorough Content
“ . I am glad I took this class!”
ART6
“the , but if you put the time into it you can get a good grade.”
ART6

Online

Online midterms and and answers largely come from the textbook.

Book-Based ExamsLong FinalsReading Required
“A lot if not ALL of the answer to the midterm and .”
ART6
“the , but if you put the time into it you can get a good grade.”
ART

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class is not hard its just very time consuming. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews (5 online, 10 in-person tagged), highlighting tone, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

👎 Communication Tone

28/100

“Very very rude. She does not seem to know how to communicate without being rude or condescending.”

📚 Reading Load

24/100

“ !”

⏱️ Time Sink

24/100

“ .”

🎁

50/100

“GIVES ALOT OF , THOUGH- GOOD STUFF, LIKE 15% WORTH.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • Very very rude
  • She's very relatable and kind
  • Do not take her comments to heart

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Workload

  • not hard its just very time consuming
  • involves a lot of reading
  • SO MANY PAPERS

Theme 3

🖥️ About Course Setup

  • and very outdated

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews span many years with recurring themes of workload and tone, but formats are messy and grades are sparsely reported.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ART612 reviews
ART3 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values