AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

M. Alif Wardak

MATH425 · MAT11 · MATH65A · MATH35 · MAT520 · MATH25 · MAT52 · MAT10 · MATH10 · MATH50 · MATH52 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Strong pick for Calc when you study and use his guides; mixed for lower-level stats if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesFair examsStudy guides helpBoard mistakes notedApproachable
  • and fair exams with study guides
  • Some report board mistakes, vague help, or self-teaching especially in stats
  • Attendance often matters and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Grades can be solid with , and study guides, but an A still requires consistent effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Many say he makes calc and algebra easier to understand, though some stats and older reviews find him .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and tags warn that skipping can sink you.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

; recent Calc praise is strong but older negative reviews pull the recommendation down.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

Students often call exams and ; bonus points and if you try.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Homework and practice tests matter; some report lots of .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

and study guides win many fans, but board mistakes and vague help appear in several reviews.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and in-class exams all matter; .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Recent and fair exams, while older or stats reviews are more mixed about mistakes and self-teaching.

Main concern

Some students report lecture mistakes, vague answers, and needing to teach themselves.

What students said

“He explains everything very clearly. .”
MATH65A
“I really felt that I was teaching myself every step of the way.”
MAT10
“ ! He made calculus so easy to understand.”
MATH65A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally fair and aligned with class and practice materials rather than trick-heavy.

Fair examsStudy guidesPractice testsExams match homework

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as fair, covered by study guides and practice tests matching taught material.

Fair examsStudy guidesPractice tests
“ and cover what was taught in class and homework.”
MATH65A
“ .”
MATH425

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great Calc 2 professor! .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 in-person reviews, balancing recent Calc praise with . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ and very structured into steps.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

70/100

“ . The ”

⚠️ Mixed Experience

35/100

“Absolutely terrible. There is that this professor fails to do.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • makes calculus so easy to understand
  • often makes mistakes on the board

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and you will do well
  • Pay attention easy A

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • practice tests

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen in-person reviews span many years with mixed but and consistent themes on lectures and exams.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH525 reviews
MATH65A3 reviews
MAT102 reviews
MATH4252 reviews
MAT111 review
Show 6 more courses
MAT521 review
MAT5201 review
MATH101 review
MATH251 review
MATH351 review
MATH501 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1