AI Rate Professor

English

Sandra Torre

CAT3 · CIS1A · CAT31 · CAT98A · CIS98A40113 · CIS1A40200 · CAT51 · DOC2 · CAT30 · CAS1 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can put in many hours weekly and ; skip if you want a light class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderHeavy WorkloadDetailed FeedbackHelpful When AvailableBusy Work Heavy
  • Heavy weekly workload that often feels unrealistic for unit count
  • but
  • reachable for some, error-filled and unhelpful for others

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible with full effort and , but she is a and some still end near failing.

Both formats stress heavy weekly work; but do not make grades easy.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Content is not elite theory, but pace, volume, and nitpicky standards make the course feel hard.

Online and to units.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and online participation-heavy sections.

In-person and some online reviews explicitly require attendance or constant weekly posts.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students who want structure and ; and online chaos.

Recent online praise exists, but older online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

; meticulous on grammar and format, and is often needed.

Format shift

and .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

, and projects routinely exceed unit expectations.

Format shift

Workload complaints dominate both formats.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Helpful and , but many cite typos, outdated links, and monitoring instead of teaching.

Format shift

Online accessibility is praised more often than pure lecture quality in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Weekly posts, quizzes, stylized documents, tutorials, and exams.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize weekly assignment stacks plus unit exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person and hybrid reviews split between clear weekly structure with and complaints of busy work, typos, and little real teaching.

Main concern

Weekly assignment volume plus meticulous grading can overwhelm even diligent students.

What students said

“The amount of . Each week there were 3 quizzes, reading, group discussion, and a web-enhanced project.”
CAT30
“Unrealistic workload for 1.5 units. Weekly tutorials take 3-4 hours each PLUS 2 additional case problems for each chapter.”
CAT98A
“I took Business English online and I was very satisfied with the material covered, the amount of homework and all the . Torre.”
CAT30

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections are interactive and reachable for some students, but others report , and outdated materials.

Main concern

Workload can hit 12+ hours per week for few units and quality of materials is uneven.

What students said

“Ridiculous amount of work each week. Average time spent on assignments was minimum of 12 hrswk.”
CAT98A
“Professor Torre made this online class very interactive. .”
CIS98A40113
“Posts and note), but I didn't like the documents.”
CAT30

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and , but written work is graded tightly.

Online Open NoteWeekly QuizzesUnit ExamsMeticulous Written Work

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person and hybrid reports focus more on frequent quizzes, 50-question tests, and .

Frequent QuizzesChapter TestsProject Heavy
“Plus a few 50 question tests in between all of that. , but almost failed.”
CAT30

Online

Online students report easy posts and document work.

Online Open NoteWeekly QuizzesUnit Exams
“Posts and note), but I didn't like the documents.”
CAT30

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Torre is a , but what to do in the future.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews spanning online and , and mixed teaching quality. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Heavy Weekly Load

22/100

“Ridiculous amount of work each week. Average time spent on assignments was minimum of 12 hrswk.”

📝 Tough But

34/100

“Professor Torre is a , but what to do in the future.”

🌐 Online Reachability

54/100

“ . She is very knowledgable, caring and responsive.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is thorough & lays out the lessons clearly so you know exactly what to submit each week.
  • She just monitors the class, there is no teaching at all.
  • Ms. Torre was very helpful and , such as on weekends.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she is a !
  • Got a C+, even w every .
  • and you'll do fine!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Workload Risks

  • This class was way more time consuming then it should have been
  • Would not reccomend it to a laissez-faire student.
  • course info pages also out of date with wrong info.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

23 mixed reviews span 2007-2019 with consistent workload and , but many are old and grade data is sparse.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 55
3 out of 56
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CAT307 reviews
CAT33 reviews
CAT313 reviews
CAT98A3 reviews
CIS1A2 reviews
Show 5 more courses
CAS11 review
CAT511 review
CIS1A402001 review
CIS98A401131 review
DOC21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1