AI Rate Professor

Languages

Arlene Gunderson

AML42068 · ASL1 · ASL3 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Consider her if you value a and can handle uneven organization and quizzes.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but disorganizedPop quizzesGroup projectsParticipation mattersGives feedback
  • Students see her as caring, funny, and accessible when class runs smoothly.
  • Organization issues, password changes, and poorly planned group work hurt later sections.
  • Pop quizzes and participation matter, so effort and consistency are required.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Difficulty ratings are high and , and navigating organization issues.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Students , and demanding group work.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and stress that participation matters.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

and growth, while one strongly would not due to chaos.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

as good, but no strong pattern of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Pop quizzes, participation, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Warmth and inspiration show up clearly, but organization and planning problems pull quality down.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and group projects.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one glowing review for warmth and humor, others note rocky start, poor group planning, and heavy difficulty.

Main concern

Disorganization and last-minute group project changes can frustrate students.

What students said

“The sweetest professor Ive met. Shes super easy to talk to”
ASL1
“ video submissions at the last minute”
ASL3
“You could tell she cared. I would give her another chance once she is better established”
AML42068

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Pop quizzes and project-based work are the clearest assessment features; .

Pop quizzesGroup projectsParticipation based

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and poorly planned group projects more than traditional finals.

Pop quizzesGroup projects
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
ASL1
“ video submissions at the last minute”
ASL3

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The sweetest professor Ive met. Shes super easy to talk to, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting care, organization issues, and quiz-driven assessment. Credibility rating: Low.

❤️ Care And Access

70/100

“You can tell she really cares about their success, and is really funny.”

🗂️ Organization Risk

35/100

“ video submissions at the last minute.”

👍 Mixed Recommendation

55/100

“I would give her another chance once she is better established in the fall.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The sweetest professor Ive met
  • is really funny

Theme 2

⚠️ About Course Management

  • She kept changing the password for blackboard
  • we never used the book

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty

  • BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES
  • Participation matters
  • most students are not rich but claims next semester new book

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three mixed reviews from a short time window limit confidence despite some useful detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AML420681 review
ASL11 review
ASL31 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1