AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Diana Curtis

MAT11 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Proceed with caution—only one strong positive review and one harsh negative, so expect a hit-or-miss experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing lecturesClear grading criteriaNeeds tutoring for someFew graded itemsStudent-empathetic
  • one calls her amazing, the other says she leaves students clueless.
  • , but outcomes range from B to D.
  • Success may depend on whether her lecture style clicks for you.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Even with tutoring and one student earned a D, so an A looks like real work with uncertain payoff.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Difficulty ratings and comments span easy lectures versus needing tutoring for .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

75/100

One review says attendance was not mandatory; the .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Exactly half would take her again, matching one glowing review and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

and few graded items help some students, but did not save another from a D.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Few graded things and and tutoring demand can still be heavy.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

One student praises amazing lectures; another says she does not answer questions and study guides are terrible.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tags and comments point to few graded items and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Split in-person MAT11 experience: and lectures, another reports no help and a D.

Main concern

High risk of confusion and ineffective study guides if her style does not click.

What students said

“She doesn't answer questions, leaves you clueless.”
MAT11
“She truly wants her students to pass her class. AMAZING professor.”
MAT11

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; study guides exist but one student found them unhelpful.

Exam-driven gradeStudy guides mentionedExtra credit available

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students mention exams, study guides, and ; .

ExamsStudy guidesExtra credit
“Studied for ... which was not even worth it”
MAT11
“She's always had a , so you will never not know what your grade is.”
MAT11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She doesn't answer questions, leaves you clueless.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting in-person reviews. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“AMAZING professor.”

👎 Polarizing Experience

20/100

“She doesn't answer questions, leaves you clueless.”

📋

70/100

“She's always had a , so you will never not know what your grade is.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's always had a , so you will never not know what your grade is.
  • Her study guides are terrible.
  • She prints out her lectures or has you print them out to follow along with examples.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Definitely would need tutoring for this class.
  • even did the ...
  • GRADED BY FEW THINGS

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting 2018 reviews make patterns unreliable despite some detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MAT112 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values