AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lee Ju-Sung

MATH52 · MATH53 · MAT35 · MATH35 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material and can teach yourself—most students describe a teaching disaster.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTest heavyUnclear lecturesHigh drop rateTough graderHard to understand
  • Nearly all reviews rate quality 1/5 and .
  • Classes often start large and finish with .
  • Grades rest mostly on tests and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Reported grades include D, F, and drops; students say few pass even with homework and tutoring.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Students call the , and survival rates extremely low.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Would-take-again is effectively zero and comments .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Tough grader tags and if .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

and exams are constant, with students saying they had no life and still barely passed.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Dominant theme is that he cannot teach clearly, makes lecture mistakes, and leaves students without help.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Multiple comments say and quizzes only.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Consistently negative in-person math experience: , and massive attrition.

Main concern

Many students fail or drop because lectures are and .

What students said

“Moves quickly but not thorough or clearly.”
MATH52
“ . Hard to understand.”
MATH35
“the class started off with 50 students and only ended with 10”
MATH35

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course outcomes hinge almost entirely on difficult tests and quizzes with little assignment cushion.

Test heavyQuiz heavyFew non-exam grades

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence shows test-and-quiz-only grading with high failure risk; proctoring tools are not described.

Tests onlyQuizzesTough grader
“ .”
MATH35
“ and quizzes only.”
MATH52

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ life! the class started off with 50 students and only ended with 10 i barely passed this class with a C- and i had no life.... !!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 mostly negative in-person reviews spanning 2009-2018. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“Plain and simple he is an awful teacher.”

📉

10/100

“started with 40+ and 4 were left when I dropped.”

🧪

15/100

“ .”

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“ !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Hard to understand. Makes several mistakes while lecturing
  • His thoughts and lecture are everywhere.
  • cant understand at all!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Only about 15% of the class PASSED.
  • and quizzes only.
  • I barely passed this class with a C- and i had no life

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Survival

  • started with 40+ and 4 were left when I dropped.
  • the class started off with 50 students and only ended with 10
  • The class started off with 40 students and ended with 15!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews spanning many years show strong consistency on poor teaching and high attrition.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MATH354 reviews
MAT353 reviews
MATH523 reviews
MATH531 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1