AI Rate Professor

Culinary Arts

Robert Baradaran

CUL36 · CUL36CUL37 · CULINARYARTS · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you show up, stay dedicated, and want a passionate chef mentor who rewards effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate ChefAttendance CriticalHelpful MentorGenuine SoulProject-Focused
  • Passionate and knowledgeable culinary instructor who invests in dedicated students
  • and skipping tanks your grade
  • , and a major menu project drive the workload

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Grades range from A to C+; weekly work and projects matter, and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Intro culinary content is approachable for beginners, with moderate difficulty ratings and hands-on practice.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and multiple reviews warn that skipping means you will not pass.

All attendance comments come from in-person CUL36 sections.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students praise his passion, help, and teaching; one older kitchen-return review was negative.

Recommendations .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

He is caring and can be flexible, but and expects weekly work.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Weekly homework, Monday quizzes, and a .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students call him passionate, knowledgeable, and and recipe mistakes after time away.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and lab work rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and attendance; and helpful but strict on presence and presentation details like binder tabs.

Main concern

Missing class or .

What students said

“If you don't show up to class don't expect to pass. !”
CUL36
“He is very helpful & goes out of his way to help you if you ask him.”
CUL36
“ALWAYS BUY LARGE TABS FOR .”
CUL36

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans on weekly quizzes and large projects; .

Weekly QuizzesMenu ProjectBinder Presentation

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Weekly Monday quizzes and a major menu or .

Monday QuizzesMenu ProjectBinder Tabs Matter
“ . .”
CUL36
“ !”
CUL36

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a very genuine soul very passionate about teaching. If you show him you're dedicated he'll put the time in for you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews spanning 2006-2017, highlighting passion, attendance, and lab projects. Credibility rating: Medium.

🔥 Passion for Teaching

78/100

“Chef Robert is a great teacher & is very knowledgeable and passionate in what he teaches.”

📍

18/100

“If you don't show up to class don't expect to pass.”

🤝 Goes Out of His Way

80/100

“Chef Robert went out of his way to help me with so much.”

Theme 1

👨‍🍳 About Teaching Style

  • very passionate about teaching
  • great teacher & is very knowledgeable
  • Good sense of humor within reason

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • . .
  • Easy class and very nice.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • very genuine soul
  • though
  • I could not ask for a better introduction chef.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seven in-person reviews span 2006-2017 with mostly positive tone but sparse grade data and older comments.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CUL365 reviews
CUL36CUL371 review
CULINARYARTS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values