AI Rate Professor

Science

Susan Clark

MIC1 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her lab if you want a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringInspirationalGood FeedbackApproachableLab Mentor
  • and funny
  • Students feel lucky to have her and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

No grade is reported; moderate difficulty and strong teaching suggest a fair, not free, path to a high grade.

Single in-person MIC1 review; no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty rated 3/5 with pure busywork.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

The only review is highly enthusiastic and .

Recommendation is based .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

No grade details given; and .

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Lab work is described as helpful and complementary to lecture, without being called light or crushing.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

, and one of a kind.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Described as a lab professor with practical lab learning and .

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Single glowing in-person lab review describes a caring, funny, .

Main concern

Only one review, so broader course patterns are unconfirmed.

What students said

“ . Very approachable and funny.”
MIC1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Wonderful caring lab professor. Very approachable and funny. Learned a lot of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review highlighting care and lab teaching. Credibility rating: Low.

💖

95/100

“ . Very approachable and funny.”

🌟 One of a Kind

95/100

“One of a kind and RCC is very lucky to have her in the department.”

📝

90/100

“ ”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • Very approachable and funny
  • Inspirational

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Learned a lot of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one detailed 2017 in-person review; strong and specific but too few for high confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MIC11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values