AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Joan Rovan

ADM71 · 71ADM · ADM43800 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
44.44%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if ; many students report unclear instructions and frustrating support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderUnclear project instructionsSkip class and you won't passMixed reviewsHelpful for some students
  • , while others praise fun creative work.
  • , and weak whole-class instruction appear often.
  • Some students still get A's and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

A's appear for some students, but tough grading and heavy effort or favor.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and hard to complete from her instructions alone.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

skipping means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

44/100

About half the and quality scores are positive, but .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

, and several students report C's, drops, or failing project outcomes despite effort.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Project-heavy course with frequent complaints about impossible or .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Some call her friendly and helpful, but many say she cannot clearly teach Photoshop or answer questions well.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

and participation more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In person Photoshop and design courses split hard between and critics who say instructions and demos fail.

Main concern

and hard to finish without outside help.

What students said

“ and even if you're in class during the teaching session, they can't be done without seeking help from someone that knows the program.”
ADM71
“If you show up and do the work, then you will pass this class.”
ADM71

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; reviews do not clearly prove traditional proctored exams.

Project-based assessmentParticipation mattersFinal project

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize projects, participation, and finals as creative .

Project-based assessmentParticipation mattersFinal project
“I like the . It's so fun and excited.”
ADM71
“ .”
ADM71

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! She doesn't appear to know the subject very well, or she just can't relay material to us in a manner that makes sense.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 in-person reviews, highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Instruction Clarity

28/100

“ and even if you're in class during the teaching session, they can't be done without seeking help”

🎯 Polarized Teaching

42/100

“I had a great time and learned a lot! ! Great teacher!”

📌

18/100

“Skip class? You won't pass.”

❤️ Supportive Side

70/100

“She helped me to catch up and gave me emotional encouragement to become the Skills USA National champion”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • A but I did get extra help
  • Joan knows nothing about teaching
  • She's nice, but she can't convey material

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • !
  • If you participate and she likes you, you should have no porblem passing

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She's very friendly, but also gets down to business
  • dedicated and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

21 detailed in-person reviews across multiple years show a stable but polarized pattern with rich concrete complaints and praise.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ADM7118 reviews
711 review
71ADM1 review
ADM438001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 3