Gina Harold

NVN61 · N12 · NURSING · NUR12 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 78/100
RMP rating: 3.7/5
Take again: 100%
Difficulty: 3.5

The decision

Take her for clear, practical nursing lectures and clinical support if you can handle occasional blunt moments.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear lecturesReal-life examplesClinical supportiveCan be rudeEngaging storyteller

Strong lecture presence with clear, practical nursing teaching and real-life examples.
Students often look forward to her class and clinical guidance.
A minority report rudeness or off-topic tangents that hurt the experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Reported grades are B and B+, and difficulty often runs high, so an A still looks like real work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Nursing content and multiple difficulty 5 ratings show a demanding course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Where stated, attendance is mandatory in the nursing program context.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students call her awesome and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

criteria, but grades land around B rather than free A's.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Nursing lectures, clinicals, and exams create .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Students praise clear, interesting lectures and tone.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Comments emphasize exams that reflect .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person nursing students mostly praise clear lectures, clinical support, and engaging teaching, with some notes of rudeness.

Main concern

Tone can shift from supportive to rude for some students.

What students said

“ in the book, and she's passionate about her work.”
NVN61

“She can be rude.”
N12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

no strong evidence of extreme proctoring tools.

Exams match lectureClear grading criteria

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

teaches and that she is straightforward about exam expectations.

Exams match lectureClear grading criteria

“ .”
NVN61

“She is very straightforward on what she wants us ”
NVN61

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“If the days when she lectures. She's clear, she relates real life events to what's in the book, and she's passionate about her work.”
Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting lecture strength and occasional tone issues. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Lecture Clarity

85/100

“ in the book, and she's passionate about her work.”

🏥 Clinical Support

82/100

“I enjoyed having her as my clinical instructor as well as and there if we needed her.”

⚠️ Personality Risk

30/100

“can def be rude like the person before me said.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Loved her lectures!
keeps lecture interesting

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

straightforward on what she wants us

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

Ms. Harold is awesome!
She's down to earth, practical, and a lot of fun
She can be rude

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six in-person reviews from 2013-2017 are mostly consistent on lecture strength, with a smaller negative cluster about rudeness.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53

4 out of 51

3 out of 51

2 out of 50

1 out of 51

Course coverage

N122 reviews

NVN612 reviews

NUR121 review

NURSING1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values