AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jan Driver

MAT36 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you can self-teach from another book; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConflicting ReviewsHard to FollowError-Filled TextbookFast Email RepliesTest-Heavy With Little Prep
  • and email speed and a later scathing review about unfair teaching.
  • while .
  • Textbook quality and in-class .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

strong grade feel unearned and high-risk.

Online ; older in-person-tagged reviews do not clearly describe easy grades.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Trig content ranges from manageable with notes and materials fail.

Online evidence calls the class very hard; older in-person-tagged reviews report lower difficulty with notes.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

The .

; in-person-tagged reviews do not specify policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Older students recommend her for notes and email speed, but a later student .

; older in-person-tagged reviews are positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

and the course poorly supported for tests.

Format shift

Harsh unfair-grading language is online-only; older .

Workload

Light

62/100

, but that light load becomes a risk because .

Format shift

Online ; older reviews focus on notes rather than workload volume.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Email speed and section notes help some students, while and materials unusable.

Format shift

Online review is strongly negative on teaching quality; older in-person-tagged reviews praise support and notes.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Students emphasize tests .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and praise quick emails, section notes, and availability.

Main concern

and may not match later experiences; stay on calendar and supplement the book.

What students said

“ and had notes for every section in addition to the .”
MAT36
“She was extremely quick answering emails and .”
MAT36

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One strongly negative online MAT36 review cites unfair grading, a , and .

Main concern

and an error-filled book leave you unprepared for .

What students said

“Don't get her class unless you don't have other choice. Very unfair teacher using a book that has tons of errors and .”
MAT36

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear demanding while course materials and .

High-stakes TestsLittle Prep HomeworkTextbook Errors

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring.

Online

Online feedback describes hard tests without homework that prepares you, plus a flawed book.

Hard TestsNo Prep HomeworkError-Filled Book
“ the tests.”
MAT36

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't get her class unless you don't have other choice. Very unfair teacher using a book that has tons of errors and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting support versus fairness conflicts. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Consistency

52/100

“Very unfair teacher using a book that has tons of errors and .”

📧 Online Support Speed

70/100

“She was extremely quick answering emails and .”

⚠️

32/100

“ the tests.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching & Materials

  • book that has tons of errors
  • notes for every section in addition to the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the tests
  • You just need to stay on task and watch the calendar like any online class

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three old reviews span 2008-2017 with mixed formats and conflicting tone, so confidence is limited.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MAT363 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values