AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

C. Morris

CAT50 · CAT84 · CIS65 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Skip unless you can self-manage a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized MaterialsLots of HomeworkSlow Email RepliesMixed Teaching QualityEasy Content
  • Content is easy but course organization and communication are weak.
  • Online students report chaotic due dates and .
  • ; later reviews are cooler.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Difficulty ratings are all 1 and content is light, so an A is reachable if you keep up with .

Online notes easy difficulty with ; in-person also rate difficulty 1 with little grade detail.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

Students describe low intellectual challenge, including a PowerPoint-style course with little meat.

Both formats report very low difficulty; online and .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

The .

Evidence comes mainly from the online review; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

The , and recent comments focus on disorganization and weak support.

Online student would not take again; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Low difficulty and sparse , but comments give little proof of generosity.

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students tag lots of homework and complain about scattered due dates making the load feel messy.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Praise for being amazing sits next to complaints about disorganization, thin content, and slow replies.

Format shift

In-person includes one glowing review; online is strongly negative on organization.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

and exam discussion.

Format shift

; in-person gives little assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

one student calls her amazing, another found syllabus and .

Main concern

Course materials can feel unprofessional and thin even when the .

What students said

“Amazing teacher just amazing.”
CAT50
“The teacher's web pages for the syllabus and class material were sort of ”
CIS65

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online CAT84 felt chaotic with , and no chance .

Main concern

and slow communication make an .

What students said

“due dates are all over the place. .”
CAT84

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

open-book or proctoring details.

No Questions During TestsHomework Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring.

Online

Online student could not ask questions on tests even when the .

No Questions During Tests
“I find it stupid we if we don't understand the assignment.”
CAT84

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“due dates are all over the place. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (1 online, 2 in person), highlighting organization and mixed quality. Credibility rating: Low.

📦 Course Organization

30/100

“due dates are all over the place. .”

🌟 Peak Praise

90/100

“Amazing teacher just amazing.”

📚 Content Depth

35/100

“I didn't feel there was much meat to the course, and what was there was sort of all over the place.”

Theme 1

🗂️ About Organization

  • due dates are all over the place
  • web pages for the syllabus and class material were sort of disorganized
  • what was there was sort of all over the place

Theme 2

📝 About Workload & Support

  • we if we don't understand the assignment
  • Great textbook

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

34/100

Evidence confidence

Only three sparse reviews spanning 2008-2016 with mixed detail and little grade or .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CAT501 review
CAT841 review
CIS651 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1