AI Rate Professor

Early Childhood Education

Linda Chelette

EAR20 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you have any alternative; and follow every rubric detail.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerRude demeanorBoring lecturesHarsh gradingFamily storiesAvoid if possible
  • Most students describe her as rude, boring, and focused on personal stories instead of .
  • and heavy essay or quiz load.
  • A minority say she knows the subject and grades fairly if you follow the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Even students who pass report , and .

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Students cite and essays, and advice to study several hours per class hour.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

as mandatory or imply you cannot afford to miss her structure.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and most comments explicitly tell students not to enroll.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students report , and little grace even when work quality is praised.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Expect , and multi-hour weekly study demands for a passing grade.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Dominant theme is rude delivery, boring slideshows, and excessive personal stories, despite occasional praise for content knowledge.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Course mixes frequent tests and quizzes with papers and essays under strict rubrics.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person EAR20 reviews mostly warn about rudeness, dull lectures, and .

Main concern

Rude interactions and harsh or .

What students said

“ if you have absolutely .”
EAR20
“This class was the !”
EAR20
“very rude professor.”
EAR20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Some terms allow open notes or Connect resources, while and .

Trick-style testsMultiple essaysConnect open-resource quizzes sometimesStrict rubric papers

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

some say open-resource Connect tests, others report trick questions and .

Trick-style testsMultiple essaysConnect open-resource sometimesStrict APA rubrics
“instead of as if she is trying to trick.”
EAR20
“Connect was used during this class so you could easily use the interenet, book, and and quizzes.”
EAR20

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you have absolutely .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“ .”

😠 Teaching Experience

24/100

“Nothing but and her talking about her personal life during the lectures.”

⚖️

22/100

“she gave me a 62% on an because i forgot to number my pages but then she wrote "great paper, easy to ready" on my cover.”

📚 Workload

28/100

“for every hour of her class we "need to study 3-4 hours" in order to get a passing grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very rude professor.
  • All she talks about is her family (repeatedly).
  • Her lectures are boring and long.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Tons of tests and quiz's
  • she is an if u follow the rubric.

Theme 3

💔 Overall Experience

  • This class was the !
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent reviews show consistent negativity on demeanor and .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

EAR206 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1