AI Rate Professor

Communication

Patricia Scileppi

SPEECSPE1 · SPE1 · SP1 · SPEECH1 · SPEECH9 · PUBLICSPEAKING · SPC9 · SPE9 · INTERCOMM · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you already know her style and can fully align with her views and forced textbook.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerBiased GraderEgo-Driven LecturesForces Own TextbookMandatory AttendancePreachy Classroom
  • Many students call her biased, self-absorbed, and harsh if you disagree with her views.
  • as mandatory and grade-critical, with frequent weekly tests.
  • A minority praise her as inspirational and caring, but the .
  • suitableStudentType is Effort For Reward only if you can tolerate strong personal bias.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Several reviews say As are nearly impossible or withheld out of spite when .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Content is not introductory; , and high difficulty ratings make it a real challenge.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Students report and that missing class blocks A or B grades.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

; a few positives cannot outweigh repeated warnings about bias and ego.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

26/100

Students describe , and predetermined opinions shaping scores.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

, and frequent reading or speech prep add up.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

, and self-absorbed; a smaller group finds her inspirational and demanding in a good way.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Frequent weekly tests over 100 multiple-choice items and speech work dominate the .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person speech and communication classes feel polarizing: some find her demanding and real-world focused, while many report bias, ego, off-topic personal stories, and .

Main concern

Biased grading and work is solid.

What students said

“ !!!!!”
SPE9
“impossible to recieve an A. a B”
SPE9
“A total right-wing gay-basher that espouses her beliefs on the entire class.”
SPE1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent, long multiple-choice sets with and heavy book memorization pressure.

Weekly Multiple ChoiceSubjective Best AnswersBook Memorization

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests every week with 100-plus multiple choice items and .

Weekly Multiple ChoiceSubjective Best AnswersBook Memorization
“ just the " ”
SPE9
“ and are over 100 multiple choice questions”
SPE9

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 , and . Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

32/100

“This is the most worthless teacher.”

🚫 Recommendation

28/100

“If you already signed up for !”

⚖️

26/100

“impossible to recieve an A”

📋

18/100

“ a B in the entire class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes no sense and wanders off topic constantly.
  • She spent tons of class time talking about cheating on her husband
  • She is self absorbed and unrealistic.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • impossible to recieve an A
  • Makes you buy her book and practically memorize it.
  • I probably got a B out of spite bc I didn't agree with her.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Wonderful instructor. Inspirational and well spoken.
  • She is AWFUL (personally and professionally).
  • completely biased

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

25 detailed in-person reviews spanning 2005-2016 show consistent themes of bias and .

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 59

Course coverage

SPE97 reviews
SPE15 reviews
SPEECH95 reviews
SP12 reviews
SPEECH12 reviews
Show 4 more courses
INTERCOMM1 review
PUBLICSPEAKING1 review
SPC91 review
SPEECSPE11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather_Not_Say 1