AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Dayna Mason

ART15 · ART40 · ART18 · DWGSECT · ARTART · ART101 · ART17 · ART6 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

if you are a serious art student ready for brutal push and heavy studio work; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrict CritiquesHeavy Studio WorkPolarizingRude to SomeSerious Artists Only
  • Serious art majors often improve a lot under tough critiques
  • Casual students report rude, condescending treatment and harsh grades
  • Attendance and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

26/100

Students report working hard still getting a C and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

and strict standards make even intro drawing and appreciation feel intense.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

; missing days makes students hate the class and fall behind fast.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Serious art majors recommend her for growth; filler-course students .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

and little leniency for weak drawers.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Ridiculous amounts of work and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Knowledgeable and growth-focused for majors, but many call her rude, condescending, and unhelpful.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Studio homework, projects, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person studio and art-appreciation reviews split: committed artists praise skill growth, others call her rude, condescending, and too hard.

Main concern

, and hard grading alienate non-majors.

What students said

“I am a lot better than I was day one. I learned a lot from her”
ART40
“completely rude and condescending”
ART6
“ and grades extremely hard!!!”
ART40

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects and critiques more than formal exams; appreciation relies heavily on the book.

Studio ProjectsCritiquesBook-Heavy Appreciation

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person courses center on studio assignments and critiques; appreciation reviews note .

Studio ProjectsCritiquesMandatory Textbook
“her critiques are well done and so helpful!”
ART40
“The .”
ARTART

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are serious about being an art major or . She is strict, but her critiques are well done and so helpful!”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 in-person reviews, contrasting serious-artist growth with rudeness and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Skill Growth

70/100

“I am a lot better than I was day one. I learned a lot from her”

⚠️ Classroom Tone

30/100

“completely rude and condescending”

📈 Grade Difficulty

26/100

“worked really hard for her class still got a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • to the point
  • critiques are well done and so helpful
  • speeding through a slide show

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • grades extremely hard
  • ridiculous amounts of work
  • will make you work

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • great teacher and extremely informative
  • rude and arrogant
  • fabulous teacher and is always there to help

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews with and enough detail on teaching tone and workload, but older and grade-sparse.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ART404 reviews
ART183 reviews
ARTART2 reviews
ART1011 review
ART151 review
Show 3 more courses
ART171 review
ART61 review
DWGSECT1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1