AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Siobhan Frietas

CHE1B · CHEM2A · CHEMESTRY · CHEM1A2A · CHE1A · CHEM1A · CHEM2AAND1A · CHE1A1B · CHEM1B · CHEM2B · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid if possible; only consider her if you already excel in chemistry and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnhelpful Office HoursConfusing LecturesGPA RiskHarsh Lab GradingTough Chemistry
  • Many students say explanations and help are weak, making chemistry feel harder than it is.
  • A minority praise organization and fairness in lower-level chem when students study hard.
  • unless you are already a strong chemistry student.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even successful students emphasize constant study; and help make strong grades hard.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

High difficulty ratings and comments that poor teaching inflates the perceived hardness of intro chem.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Students urge not missing lecture and doing worksheets, but .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most reviews urge not taking her, with only a minority recommending lower-level sections after hard work.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Labs and tests are repeatedly called strict, with claims of and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

, and weekly practice create a heavy time load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

and unapproachable help despite a .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Quizzes, exams, and lab averages dominate; .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, but negatives dominate: cold help style, , and high failure risk; some CHEM2A students report fairer outcomes with heavy study.

Main concern

Students feel unsupported and .

What students said

“SHE IS HORRIBLE SHE ISNT WILLING TO HELP YOU if you have questions about anything.”
CHE1B
“She has actually admitted .”
CHEMESTRY
“ . Marks exactly what went wrong. .”
CHEM2A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and high-stakes lab cutoffs.

Difficult FinalsBook Material Beyond ReviewStrict Lab GradingQuizzes for Test Prep

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and labs are often called rushed, tough, or misaligned with reviews.

Difficult FinalsStrict Lab GradingQuizzes
“Reformatted to confuse you,very difficult,the the hall after the final.”
CHEM2A
“Grades very difficultly on the labs.(which you need a 70% avg to pass).”
CHEM1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“SHE IS HORRIBLE SHE ISNT WILLING TO HELP YOU if you have questions about anything. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 in-person , and minority positives. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“she is a terrible teacher, as in .”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“ !!”

⚖️ Minority Positive View

70/100

“She is a , and helpful professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are very often boring
  • Cold,intimidating,aloof

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • May ruin your GPA
  • the

Theme 3

💬 About Help and Attitude

  • She absolutely refuses to help her students
  • Unapproachable. Elitist
  • would get upset when we did

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews with polarized but mostly negative themes, spanning years, give a .

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 510

Course coverage

CHEM2A5 reviews
CHEM1B3 reviews
CHE1B2 reviews
CHE1A1 review
CHE1A1B1 review
Show 5 more courses
CHEM1A1 review
CHEM1A2A1 review
CHEM2AAND1A1 review
CHEM2B1 review
CHEMESTRY1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1