AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Yehia Sidhum

MATH35 · MAT35 · ALGEMATH · MAT52 · MTH35 · MAT53 · MATH52 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you attend daily and can adapt to his accent.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyStep-by-step board workExtra credit heavyStrict on attendanceAccent takes adjustmentWants you to pass
  • Math content is widely called easy if , and use the board notes.
  • Accent is hard at first but most adapt; board work is neat and step-by-step.
  • ; and dropped low tests boost pass rates.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

, and a pass-friendly approach make high grades reachable with attendance.

.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students repeatedly call the material easy when they follow board steps and homework.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

; walking in and out or missing class risks being dropped.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and a big heart if you can handle the accent and attend.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

, and dropping the lowest test help students pass.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

and short tests; and review.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

, offset by accent and limited outside help.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person developmental math is easy for attenders who do homework; accent and .

Main concern

Accent and language barrier frustrate some; few say they need self-teaching or .

What students said

“Very easy class! His accent worried me at first, but he is very good at going step by step on the board.”
MAT52
“Sidhum doesn't want to fail anyone. Come to class everyday, sign in, do the homework”
MATH52
“Very difficult to understand since English is not his first language.”
MATH35

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are short and sweet, often drawn from notes and and a dropped low score.

Short testsDrops lowest testExtra creditHomework-aligned problems

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person short exams aligned with notes and homework; .

Short testsDrops lowest testExtra creditHomework-aligned
“he uses a lot of problems from the notes and ”
MAT53
“His tests are super short and sweet and .”
MATH35

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Sidhum doesn't want to fail anyone. Come to class everyday, sign in, do the and you will be fine.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 in-person reviews, highlighting easy math, board work, accent, and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

📗 Easy Math Path

84/100

“ and review your notes and this class will be easy!”

🎯 Board Teaching

75/100

“he always shows exactly what he means on the board step by step”

🗣️ Accent Barrier

45/100

“His Eng. is totally incomprehensible. You spend more time trying to decipher what he's saying”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • goes over every step in lessons to make sure you understand
  • He puts everything on the board so neat and clear
  • Say "YES!"

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I got my first A in college
  • and sweet

Theme 3

🚪

  • Attend the class daily, do the homework
  • has a big issue with class attendance
  • you MUST come to class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two consistent in-person reviews across years with , and .

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 59
3 out of 59
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MAT357 reviews
MATH357 reviews
MATH523 reviews
MAT532 reviews
ALGEMATH1 review
Show 2 more courses
MAT521 review
MTH351 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values