AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

. Ting

MAT35 · MAT52 · MATH35 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

if you are ready for a heavy math load and can self-advocate for help.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing professorHeavy homeworkTests from homeworkPoor online communicationNot for slackers
  • Only three reviews and they split hard between strong praise and .
  • Online , and misaligned Knewton work.
  • In and test-from-HW prep while another cites huge workload and no help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and a As require serious sustained effort.

Online review stresses misaligned work; but both imply high effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty ratings near 4-5 and comments about non-slacker math and ridiculous workload.

Both online and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

three reviews.

Neither online nor .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Would-take-again is 0% online, and .

; in-person opinions split five-star versus one-star.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

, and comments imply high standards with limited slack.

Format shift

Online tags emphasize graded by few things; in-person notes expect preparation.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of homework online and ridiculous workload in .

Format shift

lots of homework; in-person: one says reasonable, one says ridiculous.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

One clear-explanations review is cancelled by communication problems and a .

Format shift

Online communication is weak; in-person teaching quality is polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

or lack prep, depending on the section.

Format shift

; online graded by few things.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person MATH35/MAT35 is polarizing: and fair test prep, or no answers, public cold-calling, and crushing workload.

Main concern

Conflicting reports on clarity and help, plus heavy workload risk.

What students said

“ and does many examples in class”
MATH35
“ . Doesn't clarify anything, doesn't answer questions.”
MAT35

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online MAT52 felt poorly communicated with and .

Main concern

Slow communication and .

What students said

“Not good with communication- not just in terms of emails, possible actual language barrier, took a ”
MAT52

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

homework with in-class prep; online reviews do not prove proctoring style.

Tests from homeworkIn-class test prep

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Positive MATH35 review says most and she does test prep in class; the negative review says she does not help prep.

Tests from homeworkIn-class test prep
“most of . so have problems ready for her to answer.”
MATH35
“Doesn't help prep for tests.”
MAT35

Online

Online review does not .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (1 online, 2 in person), highlighting polarized teaching quality and heavy workload. Credibility rating: Low.

📧 Online Communication

30/100

“Not good with communication- not just in terms of emails, possible actual language barrier, took a ”

👨‍🏫

80/100

“ and does many examples in class and goes over any hw questions you may have.”

📚 Heavy Workload

22/100

“Ridiculous work load.”

🚫

20/100

“ . Doesn't clarify anything, doesn't answer questions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and does many examples
  • Doesn't clarify anything, doesn't answer questions
  • Puts you on the spot in front of the entire class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and most of
  • Ridiculous work load
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • took a
  • assigned work (knewton) didnt line up with book instructions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews with opposite conclusions and one withdrawal limit confidence in a stable picture.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MAT351 review
MAT521 review
MATH351 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1