AI Rate Professor

History

D. Reina

HIST7 · HIST34 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Fine if and papers, but skip if you need visual lectures and lively delivery.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLecture-heavyPaper-basedMixed reviewsBoring deliveryHelpful when engaged
  • Course content is manageable and one student earned an A, but lecture style can feel dull.
  • and well liked; another class was talk-only with little visual support.
  • Only two old reviews with opposing tones, so expectations vary by course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Material is described as easy with , and one course used papers instead of tests.

; no online reviews available.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content itself is not portrayed as conceptually brutal, though .

; no online reviews available.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Neither review clearly .

; no online reviews available.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

One student loved the class while another found lectures boring and not note-taker friendly.

; no online reviews available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

An A was earned and one course used papers on interesting material, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

Workload is weekly summaries or .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Helpful and fun in one course, but another review calls the lecture style boring and non-visual.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Papers and ; tests are absent in one course.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

students enjoyed to long talk-heavy lectures with little board or PowerPoint support.

Main concern

Lecture delivery can be boring and unhelpful for visual or note-taking learners.

What students said

“very boring! The material is easy if you like to read on your own but you will sit the whole class and she will talk and talk”
HIST7
“We didn't .”
HIST34

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

one section had no tests and only papers, while another centers on long lectures with limited visual support.

No tests in one coursePapers onlyLecture-based

Assessment risk

Varies

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

HIST34 used papers with no tests; HIST7 reviews do not clearly .

Papers onlyNo testsWeekly summaries
“We didn't .”
HIST34
“Weekly summaries for the text book- which isn't really a "text book" .”
HIST34

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“very boring! The material is easy if you like to read on your own but you will sit the whole class and she will talk and talk, she does not write on the board or ”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews with mixed tones. Credibility rating: Low.

📚

68/100

“The material is easy if you like to read on your own”

📝 Paper-Based Course

70/100

“We didn't .”

😴 Lecture Delivery Risk

40/100

“very boring! ... she will talk and talk, she does not write on the board or ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and helpful, and the class is interesting and fun!
  • she will talk and talk, she does not write on the board or

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The material is easy if you like to read on your own

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews years apart with conflicting teaching experiences keep confidence low.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST341 review
HIST71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values