AI Rate Professor

Economics

Eddy Chi

ECO4 · ECONECON · ECON78 · ECO822152 · ECO7 · MACRO2758 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Only take him if and groups on your own; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to UnderstandGroup Work HeavyEasy GraderStrict AttendanceUneven Teaching
  • Teaching clarity is weak due to frequent mumbling and stuttering.
  • Group work and .
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students report and an A with incomplete work, even when lectures are weak.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is college-level with charts and readings, but most students do not call it a brain-burner.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Students say , and phone use.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Some like the group method and kindness, but many call teaching ineffective and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Described as a fair or incomplete work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Expect pre-class reading, quizzes, and group work rather than pure lecture-only effort.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Positive group-work praise is outweighed by mumbling, weak new methods, and off-track lectures.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and module-style checks.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students split between praising group work and practical examples versus calling lectures and .

Main concern

, and peer evaluation can drag grades down even when content is manageable.

What students said

“He mumbles and stutters frequently which makes him hard to understand.”
ECO7
“No college economics class should involve taking tests as a group, and having your teammates be given direct impact on your grades is ridiculous.”
ECONECON
“he is pretty easy now that i look back at it im suprised i recieved an A i didnt turn in alot of work so ”
MACRO2758

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments include quizzes and group tests with peer impact .

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews mention quizzes and group tests with peer evaluation, but .

Group TestsPeer EvaluationQuizzes
“No college economics class should involve taking tests as a group”
ECONECON
“Make sure to read books before coming to class to do well in his quizzes.”
ECON78

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a but awful at teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person , and group assessment. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

36/100

“He mumbles and stutters frequently which makes him hard to understand.”

📈 Easy Grades

78/100

“im suprised i recieved an A i didnt turn in alot of work so ”

👥

40/100

“having your teammates be given direct impact on your grades (peer evaluation) is ridiculous”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He mumbles and stutters frequently which makes him hard to understand.
  • He tries to use new teaching methods but they just don't work.
  • he would get off track super easily

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He is a and very kind.
  • so and a medium A
  • Eco 7 class was not that hard for a college level class

Theme 3

👥 About Group Work

  • Being in a so much easier
  • No college economics class should involve taking tests as a group
  • He encourages you to work in group as well as apply practical knowledge

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed older reviews (2010-2013) show consistent themes but the sample is small and outdated.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ECO72 reviews
ECO41 review
ECO8221521 review
ECON781 review
ECONECON1 review
Show 1 more courses
MACRO27581 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values