AI Rate Professor

Anatomy & Physiology

Amanda Gerrard

AP2A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid if possible; the only review reports talking down to students and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTalks DownVague SyllabusPower DynamicsHard CourseAvoid
  • Single review paints a harsh, dismissive classroom climate.
  • Syllabus and ; students must record lectures carefully.
  • Reviewer strongly advises avoiding her or switching lab instructors.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

High difficulty rating and warning tone suggest an A requires careful vigilance with .

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Rated difficulty 5 with and a high-stakes, unforgiving presentation style.

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

available review.

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

The only review explicitly says to avoid this teacher or .

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Tone of never being wrong and high difficulty imply little room for student error.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload details are sparse; main burden is catching brief, easy-to-miss instructions.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Described as talking down to students, inconsistent, and .

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Review does .

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One in-person AP review describes condescending delivery, thin syllabus detail, and forgotten instructions that force students to record lectures.

Main concern

and dismissive classroom tone.

What students said

“She talks down to students, is never wrong, syllabus lacks detail, & she forgets which class she said what to.”
AP2A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

“Record the lectures so you won't miss some briefly mentioned instruction that you had better not miss.”
AP2A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Avoid this teacher or ”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting tone and clarity issues. Credibility rating: Low.

🗣️ Classroom Tone

24/100

“She talks down to students, is never wrong, syllabus lacks detail, & she forgets which class she said what to.”

📋

28/100

“Record the lectures so you won't miss some briefly mentioned instruction that you had better not miss.”

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“Avoid this teacher or ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She talks down to students, is never wrong
  • syllabus lacks detail
  • she forgets which class she said what to.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Risks

  • Record the lectures so you won't miss some briefly mentioned instruction
  • Avoid this teacher or

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

, so scores rest on a single detailed but unverified perspective.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AP2A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values