AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Annie Kellett Schaadt

MATH1A · MATH52 · MAT35 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Proceed with caution; limited comments and higher difficulty ratings make this a risky pick without more current data.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerSparse reviewsConfusing test orderClear when helpfulHard math sectionsLow signal
  • Two of three reviews have no written comments, so evidence is thin.
  • and mediocre to low on quality.
  • The only detailed but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Difficulty ratings are high and comments give no sign that grades come easily.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Math sections are rated difficult and testing order can make content feel harder to retain.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Low average quality, missing comments, and a notable teaching-order complaint make recommendation weak.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

No strong leniency claims appear; ratings imply .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Comments , but course difficulty remains elevated.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

One student finds her clear and helpful, while overall ratings and sparse detail pull the score down.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

The only detailed review centers on section tests and timing of assessments.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person math feedback is sparse; the only detailed note praises clarity but .

Main concern

and overall thin review detail.

What students said

“ and helpful. The thing that bothered me though was that she teaches a section, then another section, and is cluttered with the latest section.”
MATH52

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Testing appears section-based and can feel confusing when new material is taught before prior-section tests.

Section testsConfusing test timing

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence mentions testing previous sections after newer material is taught.

Section testsConfusing sequencing
“she teaches a section, then another section, and is cluttered with the latest section.”
MATH52

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and helpful. The thing that bothered me though was that she teaches a section, then another section, and is cluttered with the latest section.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews with mostly empty text; credibility is low due to sparse detail.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“ and helpful.”

🧠 Test Sequencing

35/100

“ is cluttered with the latest section.”

📉 Recommendation Signal

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and helpful
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • is cluttered with the latest section

Theme 3

⚠️ About Review Gaps

  • No Comments

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Three old reviews with two empty comments provide weak, low-detail evidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MAT351 review
MATH1A1 review
MATH521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values