AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

J Bernard Smith

NUT104 · PHP4 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

If , and caring nutrition or PE experience.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyWonderful and CaringClear and FunnyLoves TeachingHighly RecommendedMakes Learning Interesting
  • , and caring across nutrition and PE courses.
  • Students say she makes learning more interesting and clearly loves teaching.
  • sample.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

No grade details are given, but difficulty ranges mid-level and students focus on enjoyment rather than free As.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty ratings sit around moderate for nutrition and PE content without calling it a breeze.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Every review is strongly positive and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

; praise centers on clarity and care rather than grade giveaways.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

65/100

Workload is not detailed as heavy or light; students emphasize enjoyment and clarity.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students , and outstanding.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove whether .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person nutrition and PE classes are praised as , and .

Main concern

Older reviews .

What students said

“She is wonderful! So .”
NUT104
“She is an .”
NUT104
“Amazing teacher!!! Very fun and interesting as well as caring. !”
PHP4

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

No Clear Exam Details

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

No Formal Exam Details
“She is an .”
NUT104

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is wonderful! So . I wish she was still teaching!!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching quality and care. Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟 Teaching Quality

96/100

“She is wonderful! So .”

👍 Strong Recommendation

95/100

“If you have to !!”

❤️ Caring Presence

94/100

“Amazing teacher!!! Very fun and interesting as well as caring. !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • makes learning a whole lot more interesting
  • you can tell she loves teaching

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • So helpful, funny
  • Very fun and interesting as well as caring
  • If only there were more teachers like her!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Three uniformly positive reviews from 2010-2012 with solid qualitative detail but limited sample size and no grade data.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NUT1042 reviews
PHP41 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values