AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Brian Sorrell

PHL10 · PHILO1A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

A strong pick for philosophy if you like discussion and flexible .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyStudent-CenteredCollaborative StyleEasy EssaysCares About DiscussionFree Writing
  • Students say he cares and values meaningful class discussion.
  • and he avoids rigid MLA-style constraints.
  • Loose collaborative style works if and complete the cards.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

and difficulty ratings are low to moderate with .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

and freer essay expectations rather than heavy technical grind.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Students call him a great or really good teacher and wish he taught more classes.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Easy essays and free-form .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Light

74/100

; main caution is keeping up with the cards.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students highlight care, collaboration, and appreciation for student contributions.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments emphasize essays and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students praise caring, collaborative teaching and of the cards.

Main concern

Loose structure can let students get lost if they do not keep up.

What students said

“He's a great prof. Actually cares about what the students have to say.”
PHILO1A
“The format he want us to break from it in Philosophy and write freely.”
PHL10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on freer philosophy essays rather than strict timed exams.

Essay-basedFree writing formatNo rigid MLA

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

writing instead of strict MLA; formal exam proctoring is not described.

Easy essaysFree writingCollaboration over pure lecture
“The format he want us to break from it in Philosophy and write freely.”
PHL10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's a great prof. Actually cares about what the students have to say. Appreciates when students have something useful to add to class discussions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting care, collaboration, and easy essays. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Student-Centered Care

86/100

“Actually cares about what the students have to say.”

✍️

80/100

“The format he want us to break from it in Philosophy and write freely.”

🤝 Collaborative Teaching

78/100

“he believes in collaboration not just lecture and notes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • cares about what the students have to say
  • collaboration not just lecture and notes
  • lose way of teaching

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The
  • write freely
  • be careful not to get lost and do the cards

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • great prof
  • really good teacher
  • Wish he was teaching another class here!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Two detailed 2011 in-person reviews are consistent and specific, but the sample is small and outdated.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHILO1A1 review
PHL101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values