AI Rate Professor

Physics

Brendan O'Neil

PHY4A · PHYS1A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Proceed with caution; limited evidence suggests weak lecture support and a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-Teaching RequiredInconsistent DeliveryLimited FeedbackScience Course Friction
  • Only two sparse reviews exist, one blank and one negative on execution.
  • Students may need to teach themselves physics material.
  • Not enough detail on grading, exams, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

No grade outcomes are reported; the hard difficulty rating and self-teaching comment suggest an A is not handed out easily.

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

One review marks difficulty as very high and frames the science course as poorly executed.

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

All ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

One critical review and one empty comment leave .

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

two reviews.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not described; only a self-teaching expectation is implied.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

The only substantive comment calls the course poorly executed and says teaching yourself is the norm.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

science teaching where students teach themselves.

Main concern

Very few reviews and almost no concrete course-structure detail.

What students said

“teaching yourself is totally ''in''.”
PHYS1A
“No Comments”
PHY4A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring details.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You know, I do believe it's unfair that some of these profs' rate themselves. It's no surprise that another science course was poorly executed that's how it's done here at RCC. teaching yourself is totally ''in''.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 sparse in-person reviews with minimal detail. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Self-Teaching Burden

35/100

“teaching yourself is totally ''in''.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“another science course was poorly executed that's how it's done here at RCC.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • another science course was poorly executed
  • teaching yourself is totally ''in''.

Theme 2

📉

  • No Comments

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old reviews exist, one blank and one vague complaint, so confidence is very limited.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHY4A1 review
PHYS1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values