AI Rate Professor

Education

K Hemborg

EDU1 · EDU3 · EDUCATIONI · EDU4 · EDUCATION · EDU5 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you are serious about becoming a teacher and can tolerate heavy group work and uneven clarity.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy Group WorkUnclear AssignmentsFuture-Teacher FocusInconsistent OrganizationBusy Work
  • , especially elementary.
  • , and .
  • Some later reviews say she improved organization and remains supportive if you show interest.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Students who want to be teachers and stay engaged report earning As, but busy work and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is manageable for committed education majors but can feel hard or pointless for and projects.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Comments stress being in class, showing respect and interest, and frequent in-class group work.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; many non-majors or frustrated students would avoid her.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some students got As repeatedly; .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of group work, thematic units, projects, and academic essay-style assessments.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Passionate and helpful for teacher-prep students, but often criticized as .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of group projects, busy work, and thorough essay-question tests or midterms.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person education courses are useful for aspiring teachers but , and mixed on organization.

Main concern

, and tests or work not discussed or returned.

What students said

“if you're not educating to become a teacher... This class is definitely not for you.”
EDU3
“THIS TEACHER IS SO UNORGANIZED! YOU NEVER GET ANY WORK BACK! GROUPS! GROUPS! GROUPS!”
EDU1
“Yes, there is a lot of group work,and that makes it easier to understand and apply the concepts you learn.”
EDU4

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as thorough essay-style and sometimes unrelated to fieldwork; .

Essay Question TestsMidtermsWork Not Always Returned

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and midterms; several students say exams are never discussed or returned.

Essay Question TestsMidtermsExams Not Discussed
“Very strict, and demands and .”
EDU5
“the and not discussed”
EDUCATIONI
“Her tests and be focusing on”
EDU5

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I AGREE WITH ALL THE OTHER COMMENTS! THIS TEACHER IS SO UNORGANIZED! YOU NEVER GET ANY WORK BACK! GROUPS! GROUPS! GROUPS! ! ALL I HAVE TO SAY IS "GOOD LUCK" IF !”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 in-person education-course reviews, highlighting group work, clarity, and teacher-prep fit. Credibility rating: Medium.

👩‍🏫 Future-Teacher Fit

70/100

“This class was very useful for any who would like to be teacher, moreso elementary than HS but overall she was great though you better be n class and show respect and intrest.”

📋 Organization Issues

30/100

“Ms. Hemborg is one of the most disorganize teachers ever.”

👥 Group Work Everywhere

35/100

“GROUPS! GROUPS! GROUPS!”

👍 Conditional Enjoyment

60/100

“I thoroughly enjoyed her class. She knew what she was talking about, and was able to relate to the students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She really tries 2 prepare u.
  • She degrades students by treating them like children
  • good teacher but can work a little more on the foucus or keyterms to teach

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I've taken her several times and got an A every time.
  • demands and
  • There is a lot of busy work.. such as the thematic unit.

Theme 3

⚠️

  • as well.
  • She NEVER discuss about the exam
  • She never gave back any assigments, so the whole class didn't know how they were doing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen in-person reviews across several years show recurring themes, though opinions split and grade data is missing.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

EDU15 reviews
EDU33 reviews
EDU53 reviews
EDUCATIONI2 reviews
EDU41 review
Show 1 more courses
EDUCATION1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values