AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Judy Jorgensen

ARCHHISTORY · ARC36 · ARCHITECURE247 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Good if you love architecture and field visits; skip if you want light structure and minimal outside trips.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerArchitecture enthusiastField tripsNotebook requiredTake-home midtermFolder-heavy
  • Two of three reviews are positive about learning and field experiences
  • Required notebook and portfolio-style folder add busywork for some
  • One student found field trips lame and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

One A+ and moderate difficulty ratings, but a and strict folder work mean an A still needs effort.

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Average difficulty is low and students say they learned a lot without calling content brain-burning.

In-person only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Field trips and class presence are pushed hard enough that students feel they must attend.

In-person field-trip comments only.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Two students found it neat and ; one strongly disliked structure and field trips.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Notebook work helps exams and , but that and folder rules were picky.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Required notebook and large class folder plus field trips add work beyond light lectures.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Passion for architecture and memorable field experiences for some; others call lectures off-topic and anal about paperwork.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Notebooks, folder submissions, field experiences, and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Small set of architecture history and related courses with field trips, notebooks, and mixed reactions to structure.

Main concern

Heavy notebook or folder requirements and mandatory-feeling field trips.

What students said

“The Gamble House Boniventrue and LACMA Architectural exhibit were great - never would have done these without the class.”
ARCHHISTORY
“She expects Arch. to be your life and makes you attend lame field trips.”
ARCHITECURE247
“Interesting class --- I learned alot more than I ever expected to.”
ARC36

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; but super hard.

Notebook aids examsTake-home midtermHard midterm

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Required notebook helps exams; as super hard.

Notebook for examsTake-home midterm
“Required notebook is a pain but keeps you on track - makes the .”
ARCHHISTORY
“The only good thing about this class is that the mis term was a , but it was super hard.”
ARCHITECURE247

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“NEET CLASS - she likes architecture!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person architecture reviews, highlighting field trips, notebooks, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🏛️ Passion for Architecture

75/100

“The Gamble House Boniventrue and LACMA Architectural exhibit were great - never would have done these without the class.”

📁 Busywork Risk

40/100

“She makes you turn in a rediculus folder with everything from her class. Shw is very anal with it.”

📝

60/100

“Required notebook is a pain but keeps you on track - makes the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Interesting class --- I learned alot more than I ever expected to.
  • she likes architecture!
  • She blabs about things that have nothing to do with the lesson.

Theme 2

🚌 About Fieldwork & Workload

  • makes you attend lame field trips.
  • Required notebook is a pain but keeps you on track
  • turn in a rediculus folder with everything from her class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only three old reviews (2005-2010) with mixed detail and no recent sample, so confidence is low.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARC361 review
ARCHHISTORY1 review
ARCHITECURE2471 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values