AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

M Wang

MAT12 · MATH64 · MATH35 · MAT35 · STAT12 · MATH12 · MATH36 · MAT63 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in math and can teach yourself from the book.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesSkips stepsDry jokesImpatient with beginnersHomework-driven
  • Majority of reviews are low quality with and failed midterms
  • Some students who already know math enjoy his wit and
  • Accent and fast skipping make concepts hard for beginners without outside help

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A few call it easy if , but and urge dropping, so an A is not easy for most.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Pace, skipped steps, and the course level is intermediate.

In-person only.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Homework is strongly needed to pass but ; as optional or strict.

In-person only; limited direct attendance comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students say , and report dropping; praise is the minority.

In-person only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

exists in some sections, but midterm averages around F and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and can be heavy; pop quizzes depend on notes.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

, and can mock questions; a minority enjoy his wit when already prepared.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Written tests and midterms dominate outcomes; but exams sink many students.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math and stats with polarized views: a minority find him funny and easy with homework; most report confusion, impatience, and .

Main concern

, and low class averages on exams.

What students said

“ .”
MATH12
“our average for the class midterm was 48% thats an average of a F for the most of the class”
STAT12
“easiest class i've ever had. the .”
MAT63

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Written and failing.

Written testsConfusing examsLow midterm averagesPop quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Written tests and pop quizzes; midterms reported as confusing with class averages around 48%.

Written testsPop quizzesLow midterm averages
“our average for the class midterm was 48% thats an average of a F for the most of the class, and he refused to change anything.”
STAT12
“the and . and gives loads of h/w.”
MATH12

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! He doesn't even know what he's talking about!”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person math , and a minority of positive wit-focused comments. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Clarity

28/100

“This teacher can be confusing. If on the side.”

📉

25/100

“our average for the class midterm was 48% thats an average of a F for the most of the class”

😄 Minority Positive

70/100

“By far one of . He brings his wit to class all the time which makes the class all the more fun.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he has a but he knows that and encourages questions
  • he will makes fun of you with the whole class.
  • He doesn't even understand himself.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easiest class i've ever had. the .
  • our average for the class midterm was 48%
  • pass;however, it is not mandatory.

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendations

  • !
  • .
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve in-person reviews from 2009-2010 with consistent negative majority and some detailed grade evidence, but no recent reviews.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH123 reviews
MAT352 reviews
MATH642 reviews
MAT121 review
MAT631 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH351 review
MATH361 review
STAT121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values