AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Kris Mudunuri

MATH11 · CIS · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; students report failing or dropping because they cannot understand the lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesHard to understandRude demeanorSelf-teach requiredAvoid
  • Every review is extremely negative on clarity and teaching quality.
  • Students say lectures are unintelligible and .
  • Tone is described as rude and unpleasant; multiple urge others not to enroll.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

Comments , and warnings you will fail; no easy-A evidence.

All four reviews are in person.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

8/100

Difficulty ratings are maxed out and students say they cannot learn from the lectures at all.

In-person evidence only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

; students mainly complain about wasted class time.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Zero positive reviews; every .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

No leniency evidence; students link the course to failure and wasted time.

Format shift

In-person comments only.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students must self-study everything outside unclear lectures, which feels heavy and futile.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Consistently rated 1 with comments on unintelligible speech, rudeness, and no teaching value.

Format shift

All quality scores are floor-level in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Little detail on assignment mix; failure risk is framed around not learning content for credit.

Format shift

Sparse assessment detail in the four reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person MATH11 and CIS reviews uniformly describe unclear speech, rude demeanor, and the need to learn alone.

Main concern

Inability to understand lectures leading to failure or drops.

What students said

“such a bad teacher! ! bad person! !”
MATH11
“You can hardly understand him.”
MATH11
“ .”
CIS

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not detail exam format, but portray the course as very .

High failure riskSelf-taught material

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

rules; they stress that poor lecture clarity makes the course nearly impossible.

Unclear instructionHigh fail risk
“ .”
CIS
“I tried to learn the stuff myself, but failed miserably.”
MATH11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! bad bad bad teacher!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 uniformly negative in-person reviews on clarity and fail risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Clarity Collapse

10/100

“You can hardly understand him.”

📉 Failure Risk

10/100

“ .”

😤 Unpleasant Classroom Tone

12/100

“He is a very rude and unpleasant teacher.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Clarity

  • ! bad person! !
  • I could not understand a word he was saying
  • please learn articulation and enunciation

Theme 2

📚 About Learning Alone

  • If you like online classes where you have to learn everything yourself then you will like him.
  • I tried to learn the stuff myself, but failed miserably.

Theme 3

😠 About Demeanor

  • bad person!
  • very rude and unpleasant teacher.
  • Very unpleasant Mr.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews, all very old and uniformly negative, so but sample size is small.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH113 reviews
CIS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values