AI Rate Professor

English

? Siciliano

ENGL60A · ENG60B · ENG50 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

; and unprofessional classroom conduct.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNo lesson planChaotic attendanceUnprofessionalOff-topic rantsAvoid
  • All three reviews rate quality at the bottom.
  • Students cite , and unprofessional class behavior.
  • One student dropped after day one over hostile classroom comments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Course content difficulty is mixed, but chaos in grading and .

All three reviews are in person.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Difficulty ratings are often low and students imply the class is not rigorous, just badly run.

In-person evidence only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

30/100

people marked absent after turning work in, while others keep attending after being dropped.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Every review is a and statements that she sucks.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

and unreliable rather than fair or generous.

Format shift

In-person comments only.

Workload

Light

70/100

Little mention of heavy work; the complaint is empty structure, not overload.

Format shift

Workload is light but chaotic in person.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

No lesson plans, off-the-wall analogies, phone use in class, and hostile remarks.

Format shift

All quality scores are 1 in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mentions of assignments and tests exist, but policy is described as inconsistent.

Format shift

Sparse assessment detail in three reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as planless, poorly tracked for attendance, and unprofessional.

Main concern

, and inappropriate classroom comments.

What students said

“She has no lesson plan what so ever at all.”
ENGL60A
“She has no lesson plans. This that one class that no one ever goes to!”
ENG60B
“I had this teacher ONE day and I dropped her”
ENG50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; and grading reliability.

Inconsistent gradingAttendance-linked credit risk

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but attendance marking and grading are unreliable.

Unreliable attendance marksInconsistent grading
“She will mark a person absent on a day that they turned in an .”
ENGL60A
“She is all over the place with her attendace tracking and grading”
ENGL60A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This lady is not the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 uniformly negative in-person reviews on chaos and professionalism. Credibility rating: Low.

📋 No Lesson Plans

12/100

“She has no lesson plan what so ever at all.”

📅

30/100

“She will mark a person absent on a day that they turned in an .”

🚫

8/100

“I had this teacher ONE day and I dropped her”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Structure

  • She has no lesson plan what so ever at all.
  • She has no lesson plans.
  • Her analogies are off the wall.

Theme 2

📅

  • She is all over the place with her attendace tracking and grading
  • She will let a student come to class and have been dropped.
  • This that one class that no one ever goes to!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Professionalism

  • all she had to say was "America is the most ignorant country & that our education system sucks."
  • she answered her phone in the middle of class.
  • She sucks

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three old, short, uniformly negative reviews limit reliability despite consistent tone.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG501 review
ENG60B1 review
ENGL60A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values