AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Kenneth Sandoval

SOC17 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

If you like writing-heavy sociology with no textbook, this looks promising, but one review is not enough to bank on.

Best fit · Effort For RewardWriting Heavy Online SocNo TextbookInteresting ModulesEssay FocusedSingle Review Only
  • Only one review exists, so confidence is low.
  • The course and final.
  • Student enjoyed it and recommends it, especially if you like writing and free textbooks.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

The student did well, but success .

Single In person-tagged review; comment itself describes an online-style module course.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Difficulty rating is low and content is called interesting, though writing volume is high.

Only one In person-tagged review informs course easiness.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

review.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

The sole reviewer highly recommends the class after enjoying it and doing well.

Recommendation rests on one In person-tagged review only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Student did considerably well; no harsh-grade complaints appear in the single review.

Format shift

review.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Roughly 16 writing assignments plus midterm and .

Format shift

Workload details come from the single In person-tagged SOC17 review.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Student enjoyed the class and recommends it despite module bugs and limited interaction detail.

Format shift

Teaching quality is inferred from one In person-tagged review only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

About 16 writing assignments dominate, with a midterm and .

Format shift

Assessment description is only available from the one In person-tagged review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single tagged In person review actually describes a new online SOC17 with , and final.

Main concern

About 16 writing assignments and some broken module links; not ideal if .

What students said

“If you . There's approximately 16 writing assignments, a midterm and final.”
SOC17

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course includes a midterm and ; proctoring details are not stated.

MidtermFinalMany Writing Assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The tagged review mentions midterm and .

MidtermFinalWriting Assignments
“There's approximately 16 writing assignments, a midterm and final. I did considerably well in the class.”
SOC17

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! No textbook.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review only, so themes rest on a single student account. Credibility rating: Low.

✍️ Writing Load

35/100

“If you . There's approximately 16 writing assignments, a midterm and final.”

👍 Student Recommend

78/100

“ ! No textbook.”

🧩 Module Quirks

55/100

“The modules still have a few bad links/bugs, but it's been interesting.”

Theme 1

📈 About Workload And Grades

  • There's approximately 16 writing assignments, a midterm and final
  • I did considerably well in the class
  • No textbook

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Course Experience

  • This was a new class taught online at RCC but I have enjoyed it
  • The modules still have a few bad links/bugs, but it's been interesting

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

A single 2010 review cannot establish consistent patterns for .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SOC171 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values