AI Rate Professor

English

Susan Plesko

ENG1A · ENGENG · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can tolerate harsh criticism and will write only her way for a hard-earned A.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHer way or the highwayHeavy criticismWork for that AIncomprehensible lecturesAvoid at all costs
  • Extremely hard English courses with constant criticism and rigid topic control.
  • Students say if she dislikes the topic.
  • One softer note that she teaches a lot if you write exactly her way.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A requires writing exactly how she wants and heavy workload; students say you will work for that A.

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Every review rates difficulty at 5 and describes the class as a nightmare of criticism and rewrite pressure.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most and rigid control.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

She rejects disliked topics and piles on criticism, so grades feel punitive.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Students describe constant work, criticism, and rewriting to her standards.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Comments call her incomprehensible, always right, and a .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment centers on papers and rewriting to her preferred style.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person ENG1A is rigid, critical, and heavy on rewriting; students feel it is her way or the highway.

Main concern

She may reject topics she dislikes and flood the course with criticism and handouts.

What students said

“She if she does not LIKE your topic. Its her way or the highway.”
ENG1A
“be prepared to WORK WORK WORK WORK or this class will be a nightmare”
ENG1A
“if you any level of .”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on papers and writing standards, not a .

Paper-based assessmentTopic approval control

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews emphasize graded papers and topic approval rather than formal exams.

Writing papersTopic approval
“She if she does not LIKE your topic.”
ENG1A
“If you write how she wants you to you will do just fine.”
ENGENG

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Where do I begin? She if she does not LIKE your topic. Its her way or the highway.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews spanning 2007-2010, highlighting rigid grading and heavy workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Quality

25/100

“if you any level of .”

📚 Workload Intensity

15/100

“be prepared to WORK WORK WORK WORK or this class will be a nightmare”

🎯 Grade Path

28/100

“Is very hard. You will work for that A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a bit incomprehensable and she does think shes always right.
  • She will use crtisicm ALOT throughout the course
  • You are showered with handouts in Comic Sans font

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Its her way or the highway.
  • You will work for that A.
  • WORK WORK WORK WORK or this class will be a nightmare

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Four consistent in-person reviews from 2007-2010 with detailed negative themes, but small sample and no recent data.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1A3 reviews
ENGENG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values