AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Tom Ogimachi

MAT35 · MAT52 · MATH35 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a young instructor who cares, but expect mixed personalities.

Best fit · Effort For RewardYoung and loves mathFairly easyMakes sure you learnCan slide byMixed reviews
  • Most students call him a solid young math professor who loves the subject.
  • Course content is described as fairly easy with .
  • One student strongly disliked him and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students say the class is fairly easy and if you want.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Difficulty ratings sit mid-low and comments call the course fairly easy.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Two positive reviews outweigh one strong avoid, with praise for math knowledge and care.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students describe the class as fairly easy with room to slide by.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

68/100

No heavy workload complaints; tone suggests manageable effort.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Most call him good and math-loving, though one rejects him as immature.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and fairly easy for most, with one clear dislike of his teaching style.

Main concern

Personality fit matters; one student found him immature and not a good teacher.

What students said

“Great professor. Young but knows his math. Fairly easy.”
MAT35
“If not .”
MATH35
“Not a good teacher. Acts like a kid. .”
MAT52

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

.

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great professor. Young but knows his math. Fairly easy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews from 2008-2009, balancing positive ease with one strong critique. Credibility rating: Low.

👍 Recommendation Split

72/100

“ .”

📘 Course Ease

70/100

“If not .”

🧮 Teaching Care

68/100

“He'll actually make sure you learn your stuff if you want.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Young but knows his math.
  • He's young but seems to really love math.
  • Acts like a kid.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Fairly easy.
  • .
  • Not a good teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

and limited assessment detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MAT351 review
MAT521 review
MATH351 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values