AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Susan Farrington

N60 · NRN2 · NUR50 · NVN62 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

; students report unhelpful teaching and nightmare clinical rotations.

Best fit · Self Taught ProClinical nightmareUnhelpful lecturesShuts down questionsHard testsDo not take
  • Multiple students describe horrific clinical experiences and .
  • Lectures and , and questions get shut down.
  • Coursework and clinicals feel very hard with little helpful guidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and high difficulty ratings make an A a real fight with little grade help mentioned.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Nursing clinicals and content are described as difficult, with and high difficulty scores.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students and unhelpful lecture experiences.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

and tough clinical expectations with no signs of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Clinicals and and stressful.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students call lectures unhelpful, answers wrong or unclear, and clinicals a nightmare.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments mention format.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person nursing clinicals and lectures draw strong warnings: , and one report of a nightmare clinical rotation.

Main concern

Poor clinical experience and .

What students said

“ ! Her clinical rotation was absolutely a nightmare.”
NRN2
“She is quick to shut down questions, give wrong answers to inquiries and eats up the brown nosing.”
N60
“ . Questions are not answer clearly, and ”
NUR50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as hard; reviews .

Hard testsClinical evaluation

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests are hard; clinical evaluation is a .

Hard testsClinical evaluation
“ ”
NUR50
“Her clinical rotation was absolutely a nightmare.”
NRN2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! Her clinical rotation was absolutely a nightmare.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting clinical risk and weak teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

18/100

“ ! Her clinical rotation was absolutely a nightmare.”

📚 Teaching Quality

25/100

“ . Questions are not answer clearly, and ”

❓

28/100

“She is quick to shut down questions, give wrong answers to inquiries and eats up the brown nosing.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Questions are not answer clearly
  • Sometimes she's not sure about the answer that have been asked

Theme 2

⚠️ About Clinical Experience

  • Her clinical rotation was absolutely a nightmare
  • I among others had a horrific experience with this professor
  • she really appreciates students who are very hardworking during clinicals

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is a new professor
  • she means well but

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Four detailed in-person reviews from 2007-2009 are consistent in tone but old and few, so confidence is only medium.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

N601 review
NRN21 review
NUR501 review
NVN621 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values