AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

J. Georgakakos

CHEM1 · CHEMCHEM · CHEM3A · CHEM31A · CHEMISTRYFUNDA · CHE1A · CHEM1A · CHEMISTRY31A · CHEM3 · CHECHE · CHEM101 · CH1A · CHEM1ALAB · CHEM1B · 55 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you already love chemistry and can teach yourself from the textbook; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProOff-Topic TangentsHard Mismatched TestsEntertaining But UnclearRead The Book YourselfHostile Classroom Tone
  • Lectures often ramble off topic so .
  • Tests are hard and frequently feel mismatched to what was covered in class.
  • some find him hilarious and brilliant, many call him harsh and confusing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Many students report failing or scraping a , and never missing class because tests are harsh and poorly aligned.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Chemistry content is fast, abstract, and taught above undergrad level, so average students .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

, though some note he calls out students who look unfocused.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most detailed reviews unless they are already strong chemistry majors who can learn from the book alone.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Test averages are often low and students say hard work still yields C or fail with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Expect , and labs, but the real load is re-learning lecture material yourself for .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

He is smart and entertaining, yet , and unhelpful for actual chemistry learning.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Grades hinge on difficult tests that students say do not match lectures, with homework and reading as supporting work.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person chemistry lectures are energetic but often off-topic, with , and a love-or-hate personality.

Main concern

and many students fail or .

What students said

“You can read the book and do well on the exercises in the book but you will still fail the tests.”
CHEM3
“Goes off on tangents while lecturing way to often. Does not go over material well in class at all and .”
CHEM1A
“Hes hilarious, its like he wakes up with an act planned out every day, total nut job, sucks at teaching but entertaining.”
CHE1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

material, and drive high fail rates for average students.

Hard In-Person TestsMaterial MismatchDrops Lowest Test SometimesBook-Heavy Prep

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Hard in-person tests frequently feel misaligned with lectures; , but averages can still be very low.

Hard In-Person TestsMaterial MismatchDrops Lowest Test
“You can read the book and do well on the exercises in the book but you will still fail the tests.”
CHEM3
“ "...you would think he would changing the way he teaches!”
CHEM1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! You can read the book and do well on the exercises in the book but you will still fail the tests.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person , and polarizing personality. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Clarity

38/100

“Horrible teacher, his lectures are horrible, he gets too excited and shoots off into wild tangents about different branches of chemistry, doesnt teach you anything”

🧪

28/100

“You can read the book and do well on the exercises in the book but you will still fail the tests.”

🎭 Personality Split

55/100

“Hes hilarious, its like he wakes up with an act planned out every day, total nut job, sucks at teaching but entertaining.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • tells too many stories. doesnt teach!
  • constantly off topic
  • barely a sylabus, no outline, no clue what to study

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • more than half of the class was failing
  • barely passed the class with a "c."

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • funny guy, and completely random
  • gets his kicks off of embarrassing you in front of the class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

55

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed in-person reviews spanning several years show consistent themes of off-topic lectures and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 511
3 out of 58
2 out of 513
1 out of 514

Course coverage

CHEM1A16 reviews
CHEM310 reviews
CHE1A8 reviews
CHEM1ALAB4 reviews
CHEM13 reviews
Show 9 more courses
CH1A1 review
CHECHE1 review
CHEM1011 review
CHEM1B1 review
CHEM31A1 review
CHEM3A1 review
CHEMCHEM1 review
CHEMISTRY31A1 review
CHEMISTRYFUNDA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values