AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Matthew Barboza

CIS76A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Too little student detail to recommend confidently; treat this as a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLimited ReviewsAbove Average QualityModerate DifficultyTextbook UsedSparse Feedback
  • Only one review exists, with no student comment text.
  • Quality is rated 4/5 and difficulty 3/5.
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

No comment describes how hard it is to earn an A, so the score stays neutral.

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty is rated 3/5 with no qualitative detail, so content challenge is treated as standard.

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

All ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

A 4/5 quality score is mildly positive, but the empty comment gives .

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

No grading comments exist, so fairness cannot be confirmed beyond a neutral default.

Format shift

All ; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not described in the only review.

Format shift

All ; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

The sole review rates quality at 4/5, but .

Format shift

All ; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

All ; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person CIS76A review gives a 4/5 quality and 3/5 difficulty score but no written experience detail.

Main concern

No comment body means grading, workload, and .

What students said

“No Comments”
CIS76A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format for in-person CIS76A.

“No Comments”
CIS76A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“No Comments”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 sparse in-person review with no comment body. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“No Comments”

👍 Recommendation Rate

55/100

“No Comments”

📉 Data Scarcity

18/100

“No Comments”

Theme 1

📉

  • No Comments

Theme 2

💻 About Course Context

  • CIS76A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2009 review with no comment text, no grade data, and no consistency check possible.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CIS76A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values