AI Rate Professor

Classics

Nicholas Nardi

PSYC3 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Avoid online PSYC3 unless you are fully self-directed and ready for lockdown-browser chaos and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLockdown Browser StressPoor CommunicationSelf-Taught OnlineHarsh AI PolicyPolarizing
  • Online PSYC3 is mostly self-taught with weak communication and .
  • and questions feel unreasonably specific.
  • as caring and easy; most online reviews warn against him.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students report , and full marks, but others hit zeros for late work, AI flags, and picky exams.

Positive easy-A claims appear in both formats; harsh zeros and AI suspicion cases are almost all online.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is not advanced, but , and little lecture guidance raise the real challenge.

Online students stress self-teaching from the book; the and the paper easy.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

as not mandatory; a few online notes say yes, but the class is largely asynchronous.

Nearly all online sections run without required live attendance; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

About 30% would take again; recent online , and poorly run.

The ; online sentiment is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and , but late zeros and suspicion-based AI zeros feel harsh to others.

Format shift

; online reports split between easy grader and punitive zeros.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Expect reading, 8 discussions, quizzes, multiple-choice exams, and a research paper.

Format shift

Workload detail comes mainly from online PSYC3; and a paper.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Many call him unresponsive and lazy online; a and care.

Format shift

Online quality is mostly 1s; the lone in-person review is a 5.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of discussions, quizzes, multi-choice exams, and a research paper.

Format shift

; online emphasizes Lockdown exams more.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Single in-person review describes him as , and and the paper.

Main concern

, so the warm experience may not generalize.

What students said

“when I missed my exam he told me I can take it again which was very sweet... ”
PSYC3

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Stressful self-paced online course with sparse , and a strict no-AI policy he does not always apply fairly.

Main concern

Exam platform failures, ignored emails, and .

What students said

“ but the , and it took multiple days of going back and forth troubleshooting”
PSYC3
“Lack of communication is a big problem. He will not get back to you in a timely manner unless you reach out to him multiple times.”
PSYC3
“ . He does have helpful, ironically, AI review podcast-type videos. .”
PSYC3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; quizzes are often open-book without lockdown.

Lockdown BrowserMultiple Choice ExamsOpen-Book QuizzesSpecific Exam Questions

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

One student said a ; little else is said about proctoring.

Exam Retake Allowed
“when I missed my exam he told me I can take it again which was very sweet”
PSYC3

Online

, and feel unreasonably specific; quizzes may be open book.

Lockdown BrowserBroken Exam TechOpen-Book QuizzesMultiple Choice
“ but the ”
PSYC3
“ , and his quizzes are not on a lockdown browser and you can use the book”
PSYC3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very stressful, mostly due to class structure and policies rather than the content. . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews (9 online, 1 in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

34/100

“For some one who wrote about student engagement in online learning, the most laziest messiest online Professor I have had.”

🚫 Recommendation

28/100

“ !! !!”

🔒

28/100

“Exams require lockdown browser but the ... . So stressful!”

📬 Communication

30/100

“Lack of communication is a big problem. He will not get back to you in a timely manner unless you reach out multiple times.”

Theme 1

🖥️ About Online Structure

  • syllabus was very short and unorganized
  • Told but then gave me a 0 because it was late

Theme 2

📝 About Tests and Grades

  • is always a trick question
  • he is an discussions

Theme 3

❤️ About Care (Split)

  • Doesn't seem to care about his students
  • refused to share any detection results

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

10 recent PSYC3 reviews with detailed comments and a , but and polarized grades.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

PSYC310 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1