AI Rate Professor

Women's Studies

Rachman Jennifer

APSY160 · WS120 · WACWS12 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a and transfers; expect a lighter, guidance-focused class more than a rigorous lecture course.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring mentorCareer guidanceExtra creditClear grading criteriaHelpful counselor
  • Students praise her as a compassionate career and transfer mentor who provides personal guidance.
  • Recent APSY160 reviews are strongly positive with high grades and ; older WS120 feedback is mixed.
  • Attendance is often listed as mandatory, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Reported grades are mostly A-range and students describe lenient grading plus with modest effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Difficulty averages low and comments frame APSY160 as .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Multiple as mandatory.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Would-take-again is 100% among those who answered, and mentoring praise is strong despite a few weak older scores.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, and mostly A grades point to student-friendly grading.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

75/100

Comments stress guidance and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Students call her caring and life-changing as a mentor, though older reviews question organization and depth.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews emphasize projects, career work, and class help rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students highlight personal mentoring, career clarity, and a warm style, with a few older notes about leniency or weak organization.

Main concern

Older reviews flag uneven organization and limited subject depth in WS courses.

What students said

“She was exceptionally knowledgeable about transfers and possessed an unparalleled level of compassion and understanding.”
APSY160
“She's also really fun!”
APSY160
“this class is easy to pass because she and lenient.”
WS120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

One older review calls the , and no reviews describe strict proctored exams.

Final projectLenient assessment

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment appears project-based and .

Final projectLenient grading
“the .”
WS120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ms. Rachman... was a beacon of guidance during my time of confusion and uncertainty.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews spanning 2004-2025, highlighting mentoring strengths with older mixed notes. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Mentorship & Care

85/100

“Gotta say, Jennifer is a wonderful person and mentor! She personally helps me whenever I need and is super personable.”

🧭 Career Direction

80/100

“ totally helped me find direction in my career goals.”

📈 Easy Grades

78/100

“this class is easy to pass because she and lenient.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • unparalleled level of compassion and understanding
  • wonderful person and mentor
  • She's also really fun!

Theme 2

🧭 About Career Guidance

  • knowledgeable about transfers
  • helped me find direction in my career goals
  • learned a ton... about me, my life, and my future

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy to pass

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews span 2004-2025 with mixed detail; newer mentoring praise is consistent but older comments are sparse or negative.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

APSY1603 reviews
WS1203 reviews
WACWS121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values